IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v19y1999i2p195-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on Human Action after 50 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Vernon L. Smith
  • Comment by Lawrence H. White

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Vernon L. Smith & Comment by Lawrence H. White, 1999. "Reflections on Human Action after 50 Years," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 195-214, Fall.
    • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:19:y:1999:i:2:p:195-214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj19n2/cj19n2-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Calcagno, Peter T. & Hall, Joshua C. & Lawson, Robert A., 2010. "Objectivism versus subjectivism: A market test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 445-448, November.
    2. Kwasi Gyau BAFFOUR AWUAH & Felix N. HAMMOND & Colin A. BOOTH & Jessica E. LAMOND, 2014. "Evolution And Development Of Urban Land Use Planning: Analysis From Human Action Theory Perspective," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 35-67, May.
    3. Nathaniel Paxson & Nikolai G. Wenzel, 2016. "Praxeology, Experimental Economics and the Process of Choice: F.A. Hayek and Vernon Smith on the Misesian Action Axiom," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 29(2), pages 163-176, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:19:y:1999:i:2:p:195-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.