IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v16y1996i1p129-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Error and Bias in Benefit-Cost Analysis: HUD's Case for the Wind Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Louis De Alessi

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis De Alessi, 1996. "Error and Bias in Benefit-Cost Analysis: HUD's Case for the Wind Rule," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 129-147, Spring/Su.
    • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:16:y:1996:i:1:p:129-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1996/5/cj16n1-8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Merrifield, 1997. "Sensitivity Analysis In Benefit Cost Analysis: A Key To Increased Use And Acceptance," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 82-92, July.
    2. Daniel Sutter & Marc Poitras, 2010. "Do people respond to low probability risks? Evidence from tornado risk and manufactured homes," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 181-196, April.
    3. Daniel Sutter & Kevin Simmons, 2010. "Tornado fatalities and mobile homes in the United States," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 53(1), pages 125-137, April.
    4. Marshall, Maria I. & Marsh, Thomas L., 2007. "Consumer and investment demand for manufactured housing units," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 59-71, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:16:y:1996:i:1:p:129-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.