IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v69y2021i4p1251-1284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Tax Planning: A Perspective on the Principal Purpose Test

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo Nikolakakis

    (EY Law LLP, Montreal)

Abstract

This article provides a detailed review and analysis of the commentary on article 29(9) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD's) model tax convention, the so-called principal purpose test (PPT). The PPT is intended to deny a treaty benefit where obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement or transaction that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit, unless it is established that granting that benefit in the relevant circumstances would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of the treaty. The analysis distills the various principles that are reflected in the OECD commentary, compares those principles with principles developed in Canadian jurisprudence involving similar tests applied under the Income Tax Act, and highlights some uncertainties; but ultimately, it is intended to contribute to the process of better understanding how the PPT may affect the interpretation and application of Canada's numerous income tax treaties.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo Nikolakakis, 2021. "International Tax Planning: A Perspective on the Principal Purpose Test," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 69(4), pages 1251-1284.
    • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:69:y:2021:i:4:p:1251-1284
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.4.itp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2021CTJ4.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2021.69.4.itp?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:69:y:2021:i:4:p:1251-1284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.