IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v66y2018i2p351-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Why Canada Needs a Comprehensive Tax Review

Author

Listed:
  • Fred O'Riordan

    (Ernst & Young LLP, Ottawa)

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether the time has come for a comprehensive tax policy review in Canada. The author begins with the proposition that periodic broad-based reviews are necessary as an alternative to piecemeal policy making done through the often politicized annual budget process, and he sets out four sets of principles or attributes that characterize a good tax system. These include fairness, equity, and legitimacy; neutrality and economic efficiency; simplicity, administrative feasibility, and certainty; and international competitiveness. The author then proceeds with an examination of the latter two sets of principles, using a number of available indicators of how well our existing tax system measures up against each of them. He concludes that evidence using these two principles alone suggests that there is sufficient scope for improvement in the existing system to merit a comprehensive policy review. He also provides some brief corroborative commentary on the first two sets of principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Fred O'Riordan, 2018. "Policy Forum: Why Canada Needs a Comprehensive Tax Review," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 66(2), pages 351-362.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:2:p:351-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2018CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:2:p:351-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.