IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v62y2014i4p971-983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking RRIF Withdrawals: New Rates and Methodologies for New Realities

Author

Listed:
  • Moshe A. Milevsky

    (Schulich School of Business, York University; IFID Centre, Fields Institute, Toronto)

Abstract

In this article, the author employs a microeconomic framework to examine the registered retirement income fund (RRIF) withdrawal schedule in the context of current interest rates and longevity projections. He argues that today's demographic and economic realities require that the schedule be revised to remain justifiable and fair. The methodology employed in this article differs from other policy-based (or probabilistic) arguments: the author compares the legislated withdrawal schedule with an optimal withdrawal schedule in a consumption-smoothing life cycle model (LCM) for a longevity risk-averse retiree. He argues that while the LCM might be able to justify the RRIF withdrawal rates in place during the late 1980s (a period with higher interest rates and lower longevity), a quarter of a century later the schedule has become outdated.

Suggested Citation

  • Moshe A. Milevsky, 2014. "Rethinking RRIF Withdrawals: New Rates and Methodologies for New Realities," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 62(4), pages 971-983.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:4:p:971-983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2014CTJ4.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Huaxiong & Milevsky, Moshe A., 2016. "Longevity risk and retirement income tax efficiency: A location spending rate puzzle," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 50-62.
    2. William B.P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin, 2015. "Drawing Down Our Savings: The Prospects for RRIF Holders Following the 2015 Federal Budget," e-briefs 210, C.D. Howe Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:4:p:971-983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.