IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v48y2022i1p91-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Skill Mismatch of Indigenous Peoples in Canada: Findings from PIAAC

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Maslov
  • Jianwei Zhong

Abstract

In the Canadian sample of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, lower scores within occupation groups are more common among Indigenous individuals (not living on reserves) than for non-Indigenous individuals. This may be interpreted as evidence of what economists call under-skilling, with no implications regarding current job performance, but which has been associated with increased vulnerability to job loss during economic downturns. Estimated under-skilling rates are higher for English or French literacy among First Nations men, for numeracy among First Nations women, and for both proficiency domains among Inuit women and men. Over-skilling is primarily associated with inefficient use of labour resources and reduced welfare. Controlling for demographic characteristics, we find no consistent statistically significant evidence that the odds of being over-skilled—that is, of having higher scores than those within the same occupation group—are different for Indigenous individuals compared with non-Indigenous individuals. In estimated wage equations, wage differences shrink when our over-skilling and under-skilling estimates are added to the controls, but First Nations differences remain negative and significant, particularly for men.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Maslov & Jianwei Zhong, 2022. "Skill Mismatch of Indigenous Peoples in Canada: Findings from PIAAC," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 48(1), pages 91-107, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:1:p:91-107
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2020-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2020-100
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2020-100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zineb Draissi & Yu Rong, 2023. "Estimating the Determinants and Extent of Morocco’s Education and Skill Mismatch Through the STEP Survey," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:1:p:91-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.