IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v3y1977i4p533-545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Exemption of Specialization Agreements: As Proposed for Stage II Amendments to the Combines Investigation Act

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Stegemann

Abstract

In March 1977, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-42 proposing a second phase of amendments to the Combines Act. This paper examines Section 31.76 of the bill which under certain conditions would exempt specialization agreements from the general prohibition of arrangement in restraint of competition. The Government has taken a relatively cautious approach by proposing a narrow definition for exemptable agreements and by requiring strong safeguards for competition which would give the Competition Board the power to make an exemption conditional on a reduction or removal of import barriers.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Stegemann, 1977. "The Exemption of Specialization Agreements: As Proposed for Stage II Amendments to the Combines Investigation Act," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 3(4), pages 533-545, Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:3:y:1977:i:4:p:533-545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28197723%293%3A4%3C533%3ATEOSAA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eli W. Clemens, 1950. "Price Discrimination and the Multiple-Product Firm," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:3:y:1977:i:4:p:533-545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.