IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v35y2009i4p493-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Report of the Expert Panel on Older Workers: How Should Public Pensions Be Improved?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Baker
  • Kevin Milligan

Abstract

The recent report of the Expert Panel on Older Workers provided an important focus on retirement income policy. We comment here on the Panel's recommendations that aim to support continued work by older Canadians. We find that the focus on removing barriers to continued work is well-motivated, practical, and sensible. Particular attention must be paid to the full actuarial cost of reforms, however. Overall, the recommendations provide a sterling benchmark for future efforts to reform Canada's retirement income system.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Baker & Kevin Milligan, 2009. "The Report of the Expert Panel on Older Workers: How Should Public Pensions Be Improved?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 35(4), pages 493-498, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:35:y:2009:i:4:p:493-498
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.35.4.493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.35.4.493
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.35.4.493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:35:y:2009:i:4:p:493-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.