IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v18y1992i1p47-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of Our Forests - Report of the British Columbia Forest Resources Commission: A Critique

Author

Listed:
  • David L. Haley
  • Jeanette Leitch

Abstract

In April 1991, the first report of the British Columbia Forest Resources Commission was released. This comprehensive document contains 108 specific recommendations which, if implemented, would have far-reaching consequences for the structure of British Columbia's forest products manufacturing sector and the way in which the province's public forests are administered and managed. In this paper, the report is placed in an historical context, the Commission's findings are reviewed and the implications of the major recommendations are critically examined.

Suggested Citation

  • David L. Haley & Jeanette Leitch, 1992. "The Future of Our Forests - Report of the British Columbia Forest Resources Commission: A Critique," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(1), pages 47-56, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:18:y:1992:i:1:p:47-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28199203%2918%3A1%3C47%3ATFOOFR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sivaguru Sahajananthan & David L. Haley & John Nelson, 1998. "Planning for Sustainable Forests in British Columbia through Land Use Zoning," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(s2), pages 73-81, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:18:y:1992:i:1:p:47-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.