IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000549/019353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alianzas para la innovación en organizaciones intensivas en conocimiento: el caso de México

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Carlos Becerril-Elías
  • Humberto Merritt

Abstract

Las alianzas tecnológicas entre organizaciones intensivas en conocimiento enfrentan desafíos relativos a la eficiencia de la vinculación, su efectividad, su duración e incluso al impacto esperado en la innovación; además, algunas de ellas son desconocidas de forma anticipada por las organizaciones. Este artículo analizó los factores que influyen en la formación de este tipo de alianzas en el sector industrial mexicano. La hipótesis plantea que las alianzas entre organizaciones intensivas en conocimiento se ven afectadas por distorsiones, discrepancias y empirismos aplicativos debido a visiones incompletas por parte de los líderes. Para el desarrollo de este trabajo, se emplearon cuestionarios y entrevistas a actores relevantes de dos organizaciones mexicanas intensivas en conocimiento, una del sector académico y otra del sector productivo, esto con la finalidad de identificar los recursos que poseían previamente a la formalización de la alianza tecnológica y cómo sirven a la toma de decisiones. Los resultados revelaron que el rol que desempenen los líderes tiende a robustecer la posición estratégica de las organizaciones involucradas, siempre que las actividades de investigación complementen los recursos y capacidades disponibles, sirviendo éstas para afianzar la colaboración. Se concluye que las alianzas interorganizacionales son fundamentales para lograr el éxito en el campo empresarial y en distintos sectores, sin embargo, debe tomarse en cuenta que no siempre estas asociaciones satisfacen las expectativas de los participantes.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Carlos Becerril-Elías & Humberto Merritt, 2021. "Alianzas para la innovación en organizaciones intensivas en conocimiento: el caso de México," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 7(14), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000549:019353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/revista-cea/article/view/1780
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Didi Muwardi & Saide Saide & Richardus Eko Indrajit & Mohammad Iqbal & Endang Siti Astuti & Herzavina Herzavina, 2020. "Intangible Resources And Institution Performance: The Concern Of Intellectual Capital, Employee Performance, Job Satisfaction, And Its Impact On Organization Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(05), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Calvin S. Weng, 2017. "Innovation Intermediaries in Technological Alliances," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Zhao, Jianyu & Wu, Guangdong & Xi, Xi & Na, Qi & Liu, Weiwei, 2018. "How collaborative innovation system in a knowledge-intensive competitive alliance evolves? An empirical study on China, Korea and Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 128-146.
    4. David J. Collis, 1994. "Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 143-152, December.
    5. Daniel Levinthal & Jennifer Myatt, 1994. "Co‐Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S1), pages 45-62, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alejandro Valencia-Arias & María Lucelly Urrego-Marín & Lemy Bran-Piedrahita, 2021. "A Methodological Model to Evaluate Smart City Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mait Rungi, 2012. "Influential Capabilities and Their Development in a Project Business: Results of an Estonian Survey," Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, vol. 4(2).
    2. Aziz Barhmi & Omar Hajaji, 2023. "Multidisciplinary Approach to Supply Chain Resilience: Conceptualization and Scale Development," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(5), pages 43-69.
    3. Giada Baldessarelli & Nathalie Lazaric & Michele Pezzoni, 2022. "Organizational routines: Evolution in the research landscape of two core communities," Post-Print halshs-03718851, HAL.
    4. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    5. Chen, Ping-Chuan & Hung, Shiu-Wan, 2016. "An actor-network perspective on evaluating the R&D linking efficiency of innovation ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 303-312.
    6. André de Abreu Saraiva Monteiro Alves & Fernando Manuel Pereira de Oliveira Carvalho, 2022. "How Dynamic Managerial Capabilities, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Operational Capabilities Impact Microenterprises’ Global Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. van Uden, Annelies & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, P.A.M., 2015. "Making Sense of Industry Characteristics as Drivers of Dynamic Capabilites," Other publications TiSEM fbb2a35d-c957-489b-b170-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Hangeun Lee & Seong Ho Lee, 2019. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Long-Term Relationships in the Business-to-Business Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Emilio Alvarez-Suescun, 2010. "Combining transaction cost and resource-based insights to explain IT implementation outsourcing," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 631-645, November.
    10. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    11. Ilona Baumane & Rebekka Vedina, 2011. "Capacities and Competencies as Sources of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Latvian Hotels," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 301-318, May.
    12. Rui Baptista & Murat Karaöz & João Correia Leitão, 2020. "Diversification by young, small firms: the role of pre-entry resources and entry mistakes," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 103-122, June.
    13. Malik, Omar R., 2008. "Adapting to market liberalization: The role of dynamic capabilities, initial resource conditions, and strategic path choices in determining evolutionary fitness of Less Developed Country (LDC) firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 217-231, September.
    14. Waseem Ul Hameed & Muhammad Farhan Basheer & Jawad Iqbal & Ayesha Anwar & Hafiz Khalil Ahmad, 2018. "Determinants of Firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R & D department: an empirical evidence from Malaysian SME’s," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Patnaik, Swetketu & Munjal, Surender & Varma, Arup & Sinha, Sujay, 2022. "Extending the resource-based view through the lens of the institution-based view: A longitudinal case study of an Indian higher educational institution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 124-141.
    16. Chung, Henry F.L. & Kingshott, Russel P.J. & MacDonald, Robyn V.G. & Putranta, Martinus Parnawa, 2021. "Dynamism and B2B firm performance: The dark and bright contingent role of B2B relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 250-259.
    17. Robert Zich & Jitka Veselá, 2013. "Competitive space demands accelerator and its impacts on importance and sustainability of competitive advantages," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 529-538.
    18. Jasna Prester, 2023. "Operating and Dynamic Capabilities and Their Impact on Operating and Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Der-Fang Hung, 2015. "Sustained Competitive Advantage and Organizational Inertia: The Cost Perspective of Knowledge Management," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 769-789, December.
    20. Aubakirova Damira & Jaxybekova Galiya Narimanovna & Yespergenova Lyazzat & Bezhan Rustamov & Alimshan Faizulayev & Festus Victor Bekun, 2022. "Competition Determinants of Eurasian Economic Union Oil and Gas Companies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(2), pages 336-341, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovación tecnológica; alianzas colaborativas; conocimiento organizacional; investigación aplicada;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L14 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Transactional Relationships; Contracts and Reputation
    • L24 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Contracting Out; Joint Ventures
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000549:019353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feitmco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.