IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v9y2024a8554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expanding the Social Rental Housing Stock in Flanders: Money Isn’t the Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Sien Winters

    (HIVA, KU Leuven, Belgium)

  • Emmanuel Dockx

    (University of Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Katleen Van den Broeck

    (HIVA, KU Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

In Flanders, social rental housing serves as the primary policy instrument to address housing affordability issues. However, the current supply of social housing falls significantly short of meeting all needs. Despite broad political consensus and increased government budgets for social housing since 2013, it has become increasingly difficult to allocate the budget to new investment projects. By the end of 2021, only a fraction of the annual credit had been allocated, sparking discussions. This article explores two key questions: How can we explain the delay in the supply of social housing when the need is acknowledged and the funds are available? How can this problem be resolved? To answer both questions, we use administrative data, survey data, and insights from group interviews with social housing associations and municipalities. Behind the answer is a multitude of reasons at various points throughout the planning process. Many problems stem from coordination challenges in a socio-economic environment that grows ever more complex. The notion of multi-level governance provides insights into the intricate web of interactions and negotiations. Based on this analysis, we offer recommendations for Flemish policy, local governments, and social housing associations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sien Winters & Emmanuel Dockx & Katleen Van den Broeck, 2024. "Expanding the Social Rental Housing Stock in Flanders: Money Isn’t the Problem," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v9:y:2024:a:8554
    DOI: 10.17645/up.8554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/8554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.8554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v9:y:2024:a:8554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.