IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v9y2024a6942.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Appropriations Over Europe’s Borderland: El Principe’s Growth as a Vestige of Colonial Urbanism

Author

Listed:
  • Mari Paz Agundez

    (Institute for Architecture, Technical University of Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

My work investigates the spatial transformations generated by conflicting competencies in the border city of Ceuta, a Spanish exclave on the northernmost tip of Morocco. Due to its strategic location, Ceuta became the gateway to the Spanish Protectorate over Morocco. Its implemented masterplan was rooted in the colonial urbanizing strategy of social segregation; yet failed to encompass the entirety of the territory, rendering the border area a site for informal urban settlements. Spain’s 1986 accession to the EU granted the exclave a new role as an icon of Fortress Europe, hindering migration movements toward mainland Europe and, due to the municipality’s neglect of the multifarious stranded migrant groups, settlements ballooned into districts along the border checkpoints. This article investigates the spatial conflicts generated by the border and how these, in turn, shape the borderland. It examines how supra-national actors manipulate urban planning to establish dominance, ostracizing the border region, and studies whether migrants’ spatial practices can effectively disrupt their socio-spatial segregation. Focusing on the border district of El Principe, a twofold methodology is followed: A top-down perspective is built through mapping, examining historical masterplans, policy analysis, and interviews, and a bottom-up stance is included, grounded on participant observation and semi-structured interviews, revealing migrants’ spatial appropriation tactics.

Suggested Citation

  • Mari Paz Agundez, 2024. "Spatial Appropriations Over Europe’s Borderland: El Principe’s Growth as a Vestige of Colonial Urbanism," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v9:y:2024:a:6942
    DOI: 10.17645/up.6942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.6942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Geddes, 2005. "Europe's Border Relationships and International Migration Relations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 787-806, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deljana Iossifova & David Kostenwein, 2024. "Urban Borderlands: Difference, Inequality, and Spatio-Temporal In-Betweenness in Cities," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Loužek, 2008. "Zachrání Evropu imigrace? [Will immigration save Europe?]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(3), pages 362-379.
    2. Susan Beth Rottmann & Ivan Josipovic & Ursula Reeger, 2020. "Beyond Legal Status: Exploring Dimensions of Belonging among Forced Migrants in Istanbul and Vienna," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 241-251.
    3. Müller-Funk, Lea & Fröhlich, Christiane & Bank, André, 2020. "State(s) of negotiation: Drivers of forced migration governance in most of the world," GIGA Working Papers 323, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Cristina Procházková Ilinitchi, 2014. "Migration Policy as a Precondition for a Common Labour Market in the European Union [Migrační politika jako předpoklad společného trhu práce v evropské unii]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(5), pages 41-53.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v9:y:2024:a:6942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.