IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i3p363-375.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary

Author

Listed:
  • João Pedro Costa

    (CIAUD, Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and Design, Lisbon School of Architecture, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Maria J. Andrade

    (Department of Art and Architecture, University of Malaga, Spain)

  • Francesca Dal Cin

    (CIAUD, Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and Design, Lisbon School of Architecture, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

If delta and estuary areas are observed under the perspective of a double system of dynamic infrastructures, the object of parallel “water/urbanisation” processes, the interface spaces become key nodes. In this perspective, port and waterfront areas can be described as spaces of mediation. The article argues that in the case of Lisbon and the Tagus, as possibly in several other port cities, these edge spaces can be described as “fluid territories.” The pre-eminent characteristic of “fluid territories” is that they are not permanent, neither in space nor time. These areas present accelerated transformations, less defined boundaries, and an increased spatial and management complexity. Moreover, “fluid territories” also mediate (a) the culture-natural environment, with human action appropriating the natural system through infrastructure and urbanisation, and (b) the industrialised economic estuary, with its continuous updating. To demonstrate this hypothesis, two samples of Lisbon’s riverfront are observed, recording its constant variability over the last 200 years of industrialisation, emphasising the “fluidity” of the mediating spaces. The understanding of the “fluid” characteristic of water/land mediation spaces is relevant for the present. Being dynamic and regularly reinventing spaces, spatial planning, public space, and architectural design processes in “fluid territories” should increasingly seek adaptability, flexibility, and openness to change. In the climatic context of continuous uncertainty combined with the need to make room for infrastructure, rethinking mediation areas through the lens of the theoretical concept of the “fluid territory” enables the implementation of urban transformation processes consistent with contemporary challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • João Pedro Costa & Maria J. Andrade & Francesca Dal Cin, 2023. "The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 363-375.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:3:p:363-375
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v8i3.6770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v8i3.6770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carola Hein, 2021. "Port City Porosity: Boundaries, Flows, and Territories," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9.
    2. Carola Hein, 2021. "Port City Porosity: Boundaries, Flows, and Territories," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9.
    3. Carola Hein & Yvonne van Mil, 2020. "Mapping as Gap-Finder: Geddes, Tyrwhitt, and the Comparative Spatial Analysis of Port City Regions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 152-166.
    4. Carola Hein & Yvonne van Mil, 2020. "Mapping as Gap-Finder: Geddes, Tyrwhitt, and the Comparative Spatial Analysis of Port City Regions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 152-166.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Breś & Piotr Lorens, 2023. "Shaping the New Vistula Spit Channel: Political, Economic, and Environmental Aspects," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 275-288.
    2. Anastasiia Dubinina & Aleksandra Wawrzyńska & Karolina A. Krośnicka, 2022. "Permeability of Waterfronts—Contemporary Approach in Designing Urban Blue Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Enrico Tommarchi, 2025. "Waterfront Redevelopment Five Decades Later: An Updated Typology and Research Agenda," Ocean and Society, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2.
    4. Karel Van den Berghe & Erik Louw & Filip Pliakis & Tom Daamen, 2023. "When “port-out – city-in” becomes a strategy: is the port–city interface conflict in Amsterdam an observation or a self-fulfilling prophecy?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 330-350, June.
    5. João Pedro Costa & Maria J. Andrade & Francesca Dal Cin, 2023. "The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 363-375.
    6. Justyna Breś & Piotr Lorens, 2023. "Shaping the New Vistula Spit Channel: Political, Economic, and Environmental Aspects," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 275-288.
    7. María J. Andrade & João Pedro Costa & Eduardo Jiménez-Morales & Jonathan Ruiz-Jaramillo, 2021. "A City Profile of Malaga: The Role of the Port-City Border throughout Historical Transformations," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 105-118.
    8. Bruno Moeremans & Michaël Dooms & Elvira Haezendonck, 2023. "Long-term analysis of traffic flows in European inland ports: implications for the port–city interface," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 25(2), pages 272-300, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:3:p:363-375. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.