IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i3p144-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Kornélia Losonczy

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)

  • Annamária Orbán

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary / Department of Sociology and Communication, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)

  • Melinda Benkő

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)

Abstract

This study examines the changes undergone by urban centers within Greater Budapest’s extension area, which was annexed to the capital of Hungary in 1950, and which is, with minor modifications, equivalent to the outer zone today. The article compares the development methods of two different political systems: state socialism (i.e., the communist regime) between 1950 and 1990, and post-socialist capitalism after 1990. Over a longer period, the urban development of Budapest has made a long but circular journey from decentralized to a decentralized–disjointed socio-spatial development system, passing through a centrally-planned communist era between 1945 and 1990. Nevertheless, closer examination of this process reveals that several paradigm shifts took place in the design methodology, which was strongly influenced by socio-economic changes. These shifts, layered upon the inherited structure, as well as the neglect or preference of different systems, caused great differences in the development histories of centers on the outskirts. Therefore, we have set up a development typology for the centers on the outskirts by summarizing the planning history at the city level. Based on how well the center was able to incorporate itself into the larger metropolis since 1950, we have distinguished the following development models: the metropolized, the transcript, the rehabilitated, and the urban village model. This typology is extended to include new urban centers that formed during state socialism (between 1950 and 1990) and post-socialist capitalism (since 1990).

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Kornélia Losonczy & Annamária Orbán & Melinda Benkő, 2022. "Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 144-158.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:3:p:144-158
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i3.5426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5426
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v7i3.5426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamás Egedy & Zoltán Kovács & Attila Csaba Kondor, 2017. "Metropolitan region building and territorial development in Budapest: the role of national policies," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 14-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiří Malý & Marek Lichter & Tomáš Krejčí, 2024. "The elusive role of urban form, centrality and scale in the absence of a metropolitan planning agenda: Central European perspective," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    2. Dan Lupu & Liviu-George Maha & Elena-Daniela Viorica, 2023. "The relevance of smart cities’ features in exploring urban labour market resilience: the specificity of post-transition economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 2406-2425, December.
    3. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Szylar, Marta & Cegielska, Katarzyna & Noszczyk, Tomasz & Hernik, Józef & Gawroński, Krzysztof & Dixon-Gough, Robert & Jombach, Sándor & Valánszki, István & Filepné Kovács, Kr, 2019. "Towards three decades of spatial development transformation in two contrasting post-Soviet cities—Kraków and Budapest," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 328-339.
    4. Anna Kornélia Losonczy & Annamária Orbán & Melinda Benkő, 2022. "Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 144-158.
    5. Melinda Benkő & Bence Bene & Ádám Pirity & Árpád Szabó & Tamás Egedy, 2021. "Real vs. Virtual City: Planning Issues in a Discontinuous Urban Area in Budapest’s Inner City," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 150-163.
    6. Yingyuan Liu & Qian Wan & Wenhui Chen, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Digital Inclusive Finance as a Catalyst for Rural Revitalization: An Empirical Analysis from the County Development Perspective in Hubei Province," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 11548-11580, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:3:p:144-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.