Author
Listed:
- Veronika Mooses
(Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Estonia)
- Ingmar Pastak
(Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Estonia)
- Pilleriine Kamenjuk
(Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Estonia)
- Age Poom
(Department of Geography, University of Tartu, Estonia / Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Finland)
Abstract
Coping with global climate challenges requires changes in both individual practices and the technical infrastructure in which people operate. Retrofitting existing buildings with smart and sustainable technologies shows the potential in reducing the environmental impacts of the housing sector and improving the quality of life for residents. However, the efficiency of these means depends on their individual and societal acceptance. This calls for the need to incorporate social practice theories into the discussion of smart cities and technology adoption. This study aims to understand how smart retrofit intervention in an extensive pioneering smart city project in Estonia is perceived among the residents with different dispositions towards the environment and technology in an early phase of the intervention. We interviewed the residents of 18 Soviet-era apartment buildings which underwent a complete retrofit into nearly zero-energy buildings equipped with smart technologies. The results showed that pro-technology residents expressed high interest and trust towards smart retrofit intervention, while residents with environmentally inclined dispositions conveyed more critical arguments. This indicates that individuals’ underlying dispositions may result in different social practices and that a diverse set of engagement approaches are crucial for the success and social acceptance of large-scale pioneering projects in the housing sector.
Suggested Citation
Veronika Mooses & Ingmar Pastak & Pilleriine Kamenjuk & Age Poom, 2022.
"Residents’ Perceptions of a Smart Technology Retrofit Towards Nearly Zero-Energy Performance,"
Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 20-32.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:2:p:20-32
DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i2.5020
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:2:p:20-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.