IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i1p336-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Housing in Belgium and the Netherlands: A Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Els De Vos

    (Henry van de Velde Research Group, University of Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Lidwine Spoormans

    (Architectural Engineering + Technology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Collective housing (CH) is undergoing a revival in Belgium. Since 2009, the Flemish Government Architect and his team have been advocating CH, stressing its importance as a task for architects given the demand for affordable housing and the need to reduce the environmental impact of housing. This support for CH has converged with the work of the non-profit citizen organization Samenhuizen (“Living together”) and the ad hoc initiatives taken by individual households and architects. In the Netherlands too, where there is a longer tradition of CH, the phenomenon is once more on the rise because of the housing crisis. As it is a developing topic, the terminology used for CH is also evolving. Drawing on publications on the subject in both Belgium and the Netherlands as well as on interviews with relevant stakeholders, this article sheds light on two widely published cases in both countries (pioneering and current, greenfield and conversion). These cases are compared in regard to thematic areas, based on an extensive literature study on collaborative housing by Lang et al. (2018). In addition to such aspects as the balance between “individuality” and the “collective,” we compare the role played by architects in both countries. Besides similarities, we show that the historical context, and especially the housing policy of each country, has a great influence and that the role of the architect is essential in the development of older and contemporary cohousing projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Els De Vos & Lidwine Spoormans, 2022. "Collective Housing in Belgium and the Netherlands: A Comparative Analysis," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 336-348.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:1:p:336-348
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i1.4750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4750
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v7i1.4750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wouter Bervoets & Hilde Heynen, 2013. "The obduracy of the detached single family house in Flanders," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 358-380, December.
    2. Wouter Bervoets & Hilde Heynen, 2013. "The obduracy of the detached single family house in Flanders," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 358-380, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yael Allweil & Gaia Caramellino, 2022. "The Terms of Dwelling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 193-196.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Els De Vos & Lidwine Spoormans, 2022. "Collective Housing in Belgium and the Netherlands: A Comparative Analysis," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 336-348.
    2. Griet Juwet & Michael Ryckewaert, 2018. "Energy Transition in the Nebular City: Connecting Transition Thinking, Metabolism Studies, and Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:1:p:336-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.