IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v5y2020i2p1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriela Christmann

    (Dynamics of Communication, Knowledge and Spatial Development Department, IRS–Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Germany / Department of Sociology, TU Berlin, Germany)

  • Ajit Singh

    (Dynamics of Communication, Knowledge and Spatial Development Department, IRS–Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Germany)

  • Jörg Stollmann

    (Institute of Architecture, TU Berlin, Germany)

  • Christoph Bernhardt

    (Department of Historical Research, IRS–Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Germany / Department of History, HU Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

This editorial introduces the subject matter of the thematic issue, which includes a diverse collection of contributions from authors in various disciplines including, history, architecture, planning, sociology and geography. Within the context of mediatisation processes—and the increased use of ever-expanding I&C technologies—communication has undergone profound changes. As such, this thematic issue will discuss how far (digital) media tools and their social uses in urban design and planning have impacted the visualisation of urban imaginations and how urban futures are thereby communicatively produced. Referring to an approach originating from the media and communication sciences, the authors begin with an outline of the core concepts of mediatisation and digitalisation. They suggest how the term ‘visualisation’ can be conceived and, against this background, based upon the sociological approach of communicative constructivism, a proposal is offered, which diverges from traditional methods of conceptualising visualisations: Instead, it highlights the need for a greater consideration towards the active role of creators (e.g., planners) and recipients (e.g., stakeholders) as well as the distinctive techniques of communication involved (e.g., a specific digital planning tools). The authors in this issue illustrate how communicative construction, particularly the visual construction of urban futures, can be understood, depending upon the kind of social actors as well as the means of communication involved. The editorial concludes with a summary of the main arguments and core results presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriela Christmann & Ajit Singh & Jörg Stollmann & Christoph Bernhardt, 2020. "Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-9.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v5:y:2020:i:2:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v5i2.3279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/3279
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v5i2.3279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patsy Healey, 2013. "Circuits of Knowledge and Techniques: The Transnational Flow of Planning Ideas and Practices," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1510-1526, September.
    2. Luís Carvalho, 2015. "Smart cities from scratch? A socio-technical perspective," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 43-60.
    3. Ajit Singh & Gabriela Christmann, 2020. "Citizen Participation in Digitised Environments in Berlin: Visualising Spatial Knowledge in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 71-83.
    4. Sebastian Weise & Alexander Wilson & Geoff Vigar, 2020. "Reflections on Deploying Community-Driven Visualisations for Public Engagement in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 59-70.
    5. Tino Mager & Carola Hein, 2020. "Digital Excavation of Mediatized Urban Heritage: Automated Recognition of Buildings in Image Sources," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 24-34.
    6. Mennatullah Hendawy & Jörg Stollmann, 2020. "The Entanglement of Class, Marriage and Real Estate: The Visual Culture of Egypt’s Urbanisation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 44-58.
    7. Nick Couldry & Hilde Stephansen & Aristea Fotopoulou & Richard Macdonald & Wilma Clark & Luke Dickens, 2014. "Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 54411, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Singh, Ajit & Christmann, Gabriela, 2020. "Citizen Participation in Digitised Environments in Berlin: Visualising Spatial Knowledge in Urban Planning," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 71-83.
    9. Christoph Bernhardt & Kathrin Meissner, 2020. "Communicating and Visualising Urban Planning in Cold War Berlin," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 10-23.
    10. Bernhardt, Christoph & Meissner, Kathrin, 2020. "Communicating and Visualising Urban Planning in Cold War Berlin," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(2), pages 10-23.
    11. Vanessa Watson, 2020. "Digital Visualisation as a New Driver of Urban Change in Africa," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 35-43.
    12. Maud Donders & Thomas Hartmann & Anita Kokx, 2014. "E-Participation in Urban Planning: Getting and Keeping Citizens Involved," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 3(2), pages 54-69, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela Christmann & Ajit Singh & Jörg Stollmann & Christoph Bernhardt, 2020. "Visual Communication in Urban Design and Planning: The Impact of Mediatisation(s) on the Construction of Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-9.
    2. Byron Ioannou & Gregoris Kalnis & Lora Nicolaou, 2021. "Public Space at the “Palm of a Hand”: Perceptions of Urban Projects Through Digital Media," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 242-256.
    3. Füg, Franz & Ibert, Oliver, 2020. "Assembling social innovations in emergent professional communities. The case of learning region policies in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 28(3), pages 541-562.
    4. Efrat Eizenberg & Mor Shilon, 2016. "Pedagogy for the new planner: Refining the qualitative toolbox," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1118-1135, November.
    5. Audrey Yue & Elmie Nekmat & Annisa R. Beta, 2019. "Digital Literacy Through Digital Citizenship: Online Civic Participation and Public Opinion Evaluation of Youth Minorities in Southeast Asia," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 100-114.
    6. I-Chun Catherine Chang, 2017. "Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1719-1742, August.
    7. Oleg Golubchikov & Mary J. Thornbush, 2022. "Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    8. Sally Weller, 2017. "Fast Parallels? Contesting Mobile Policy Technologies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 821-837, September.
    9. Paula Meth & Tom Goodfellow & Alison Todes & Sarah Charlton, 2021. "Conceptualizing African Urban Peripheries," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 985-1007, November.
    10. Enora Robin & Frances Brill, 2018. "The global politics of an urban age: creating 'cities for all' in the age of financialisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-5, December.
    11. Diogo Correia & Leonor Teixeira & João Lourenço Marques, 2021. "Reviewing the State-of-the-Art of Smart Cities in Portugal: Evidence Based on Content Analysis of a Portuguese Magazine," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, October.
    12. Amy Glasmeier & Susan Christopherson, 2015. "Thinking about smart cities," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(1), pages 3-12.
    13. Kevin Muldoon-Smith & Paul Greenhalgh, 2015. "Passing the buck without the bucks: Some reflections on fiscal decentralisation and the Business Rate Retention Scheme in England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(6), pages 609-626, September.
    14. Joshua Evans & Jeffrey R Masuda, 2020. "Mobilizing a fast policy fix: Exploring the translation of 10-year plans to end homelessness in Alberta, Canada," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(3), pages 503-521, May.
    15. Anna Hult, 2015. "The Circulation of Swedish Urban Sustainability Practices: To China and Back," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(3), pages 537-553, March.
    16. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2019. "Smart cities and entrepreneurship: An agenda for future research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Yu Zhou, 2021. "Qujing (å –ç» ) as policy mobility with Chinese characteristics: A case study of ultralow-energy building policy in China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 410-427, March.
    18. van Winden, Willem & Carvalho, Luís, 2019. "Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    19. Parul Gupta & Sumedha Chauhan & M. P. Jaiswal, 2019. "Classification of Smart City Research - a Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 661-685, June.
    20. Ревякин С. А., 2019. "Функциональность Электронных Платформ Общественного Участия: Причем Здесь Социальные Сети?," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 3, pages 88-106.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v5:y:2020:i:2:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.