IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v4y2019i3p32-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Geodesign Decision Support Environment for Integrating Management of Resource Flows in Spatial Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Arciniegas

    (Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands / Geo-Col GIS and Collaborative Planning–REPAiR Project, The Netherlands)

  • Rusné Šileryté

    (Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Marcin Dąbrowski

    (Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Alexander Wandl

    (Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Balázs Dukai

    (Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Max Bohnet

    (Gertz Gutsche Rümenapp–Urban Planning and Mobility, Germany)

  • Jens-Martin Gutsche

    (Gertz Gutsche Rümenapp–Urban Planning and Mobility, Germany)

Abstract

Improving waste and resource management entails working on interrelations between different material flows, territories and groups of actors. This calls for new decision support tools for translating the complex information on flows into accessible knowledge usable by stakeholders in the spatial planning process. This article describes an open source tool based on the geodesign approach, which links the co-creation of design proposals together with stakeholders, impact simulations informed by geographic contexts, systems thinking, and digital technology—the Geodesign Decision Support Environment. Though already used for strategic spatial planning, the potential of geodesign for waste management and recycling is yet to be explored. This article draws on empirical evidence from the pioneering application of the tool to promote spatially explicit circular economy strategies in the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Arciniegas & Rusné Šileryté & Marcin Dąbrowski & Alexander Wandl & Balázs Dukai & Max Bohnet & Jens-Martin Gutsche, 2019. "A Geodesign Decision Support Environment for Integrating Management of Resource Flows in Spatial Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 32-51.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v4:y:2019:i:3:p:32-51
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i3.2173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2173
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v4i3.2173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Libera Amenta & Arjan Van Timmeren, 2018. "Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of Wastescapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hilde Remøy & Alexander Wandl & Denis Ceric & Arjan van Timmeren, 2019. "Facilitating Circular Economy in Urban Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-4.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sultan Çetin & Catherine De Wolf & Nancy Bocken, 2021. "Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    2. Libera Amenta & Lei Qu, 2020. "Experimenting with Circularity When Designing Contemporary Regions: Adaptation Strategies for More Resilient and Regenerative Metropolitan Areas of Amsterdam and Naples Developed in University Studio ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Daniel Otero Peña & Daniela Perrotti & Eugene Mohareb, 2022. "Advancing urban metabolism studies through GIS data: Resource flows, open space networks, and vulnerable communities in Mexico City," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1333-1349, August.
    4. Marcin Dąbrowski & Viktor Varjú & Libera Amenta, 2019. "Transferring Circular Economy Solutions across Differentiated Territories: Understanding and Overcoming the Barriers for Knowledge Transfer," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 52-62.
    5. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Pamela Jeziorska-Biel & Katarzyna Leśniewska-Napierała & Konrad Czapiewski, 2021. "(Circular) Path Dependence—The Role of Vineyards in Land Use, Society and Regional Development—The Case of Lubuskie Region (Poland)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Tanya Tsui & David Peck & Bob Geldermans & Arjan van Timmeren, 2020. "The Role of Urban Manufacturing for a Circular Economy in Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Sabine van Rooij & Wim Timmermans & Onno Roosenschoon & Saskia Keesstra & Marjolein Sterk & Bas Pedroli, 2020. "Landscape-Based Visions as Powerful Boundary Objects in Spatial Planning: Lessons from Three Dutch Projects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Gustavo Arciniegas & Rusné Šileryté & Marcin Dąbrowski & Alexander Wandl & Balázs Dukai & Max Bohnet & Jens-Martin Gutsche, 2019. "A Geodesign Decision Support Environment for Integrating Management of Resource Flows in Spatial Planning," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 32-51.
    10. Franz, Gianfranco, 2020. "The Circular City and the Building Sector," FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability 308105, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > FACTS: Firms And Cities Towards Sustainability.
    11. Yu Wen & Yanfang Zhao & Ze Guan & Xinjia Zhang, 2023. "Remodeling of Abandoned Land: A Review of Landscape Regeneration and the Reconstruction of Urban Landfill Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Gianfranco Franz, 2020. "The Circular City and the Building Sector," Working Papers 2020.30, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Evinc Dogan & Federico Cuomo & Luca Battisti, 2023. "Reviving Urban Greening in Post-Industrial Landscapes: The Case of Turin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Klusáček, Petr & Navrátil, Josef & Martinát, Stanislav & Krejčí, Tomáš & Golubchikov, Oleg & Pícha, Kamil & Škrabal, Jaroslav & Osman, Robert, 2021. "Planning for the future of derelict farm premises: From abandonment to regeneration?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Maria Cerreta & Chiara Mazzarella & Martina Spiezia & Maria Rosaria Tramontano, 2020. "Regenerativescapes: Incremental Evaluation for the Regeneration of Unresolved Territories in East Naples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Kronnaphat Khumvongsa & Jing Guo & Suthida Theepharaksapan & Hiroaki Shirakawa & Hiroki Tanikawa, 2023. "Uncovering urban transportation infrastructure expansion and sustainability challenge in Bangkok: Insights from a material stock perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(2), pages 476-490, April.
    17. Marcin Dąbrowski & Viktor Varjú & Libera Amenta, 2019. "Transferring Circular Economy Solutions across Differentiated Territories: Understanding and Overcoming the Barriers for Knowledge Transfer," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 52-62.
    18. Diego Hernando Florez Ayala & Anete Alberton & Aksel Ersoy, 2022. "Urban Living Labs: Pathways of Sustainability Transitions towards Innovative City Systems from a Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-29, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v4:y:2019:i:3:p:32-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.