IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v4y2019i2p5-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Attractiveness of a City-Centre Shopping Environment: Older Consumers’ Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Anna-Maija Kohijoki

    (Department of Marketing and International Business, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland)

  • Katri Koistinen

    (Centre for Consumer Society Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland)

Abstract

Older consumers represent an increasingly significant customer segment for city-centre retailers. However, many intraurban centres are struggling to maintain an attractive shopping environment. This article focuses on older consumers’ (Finns, aged 64+) perceptions of the city centre with an emphasis on design and ambient elements in the external shopping environment. Using the focus-group research method, the aim is to identify what kind of elements these are and how they constitute an attractive city-centre shopping environment for older consumers. Findings from a qualitative content analysis show that an attractive city-centre shopping environment provides convenience and safety when moving around and running errands, functional and aesthetic lighting to cope with shopping, proper furnishings regarding places to rest, harmonious building architecture integrated with refreshing urban nature, and the cleanliness of the streetscape. Findings indicate that a city-centre shopping environment offers more to older consumers than a context of satisfying consumption needs. City shopping gives a reason to go outdoors and maintain social contacts. The study has implications for creating an age-friendly city centre, the shopping environment which supports older consumers’ active and independent lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna-Maija Kohijoki & Katri Koistinen, 2019. "The Attractiveness of a City-Centre Shopping Environment: Older Consumers’ Perspective," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 5-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v4:y:2019:i:2:p:5-17
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i2.1831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v4i2.1831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v4:y:2019:i:2:p:5-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.