IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v4y2019i2p207-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximising the Degree of User Choice. A Simple Tool to Measure Current Levels of Quality of Life in Urban Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Ioanna-Anna Papachristou

    (Sustainability Measurement and Modeling Lab, BarcelonaTech—ESEIAAT, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Spain)

  • Marti Rosas-Casals

    (Sustainability Measurement and Modeling Lab, BarcelonaTech—ESEIAAT, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Spain)

Abstract

In this article, we present a simple methodology based on Max-Neef, Elizalde and Hopenhayn (1991) “human scale development” paradigm to measure current levels of Quality of Life (QoL) for urban environments. In this procedure, fundamental human needs form the study domains. We assess their fulfilment with a set of questions reflecting the subjective dimension of QoL. We sort questions into needs after two consecutive processes: a qualitative one involving local communities and/or expert groups, and a quantitative one involving the definition of weights for each question and per need. Complementarily, we add objective indicators to reflect the objective dimension of QoL. This way, we make possible a comparison between the two dimensions and a definition and computation of an integrative QoL. We argue that this method can be used to define more holistic urban quality indexes to improve decision making processes, policies and plans. It can also be seen as a tool to enhance bottom-up approaches and processes of urban analysis to create more liveable places for the dwellers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioanna-Anna Papachristou & Marti Rosas-Casals, 2019. "Maximising the Degree of User Choice. A Simple Tool to Measure Current Levels of Quality of Life in Urban Environments," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 207-222.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v4:y:2019:i:2:p:207-222
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i2.2006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v4i2.2006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v4:y:2019:i:2:p:207-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.