IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v3y2018i4p116-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Local Governance of Arrival in Leipzig: Housing of Asylum-Seeking Persons as a Contested Field

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Werner

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Bauhaus-University Weimar, Germany)

  • Annegret Haase

    (Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany)

  • Nona Renner

    (Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, University of Technology Dresden, Germany)

  • Dieter Rink

    (Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany)

  • Malena Rottwinkel

    (Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Bauhaus-University Weimar, Germany)

  • Anika Schmidt

    (Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany)

Abstract

The article examines how the German city of Leipzig governs the housing of asylum seekers. Leipzig was a frontrunner in organizing the decentralized accommodation of asylum seekers when adopting its accommodation concept in 2012. This concept aimed at integrating asylum-seeking persons in the regular housing market at an early stage of arrival. However, since then, the city of Leipzig faces more and more challenges in implementing the concept. This is particularly due to the increasingly tight situation on the housing market while the number of people seeking protection increased and partly due to discriminating and xenophobic attitudes on the side of house owners and managers. Therefore, we argue that the so-called refugee crisis of 2015–2016 has to be seen in close interaction with a growing general housing shortage in Leipzig like in many other large European cities. Furthermore, we understand the municipal governing of housing as a contested field regarding its entanglement of diverse federal levels and policy scales, the diversity of stakeholders involved, and its dynamic change over the last years. We analyze this contested field set against the current context of arrival and dynamic urban growth on a local level. Based on empirical qualitative research that was conducted by us in 2016, Leipzig’s local specifics will be investigated under the umbrella of our conceptual framework of Governance of Arrival. The issues of a strained housing market and the integration of asylum seekers in it do not apply only to Leipzig, but shed light on similar developments in other European Cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Werner & Annegret Haase & Nona Renner & Dieter Rink & Malena Rottwinkel & Anika Schmidt, 2018. "The Local Governance of Arrival in Leipzig: Housing of Asylum-Seeking Persons as a Contested Field," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 116-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:116-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1708
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ces:ifodic:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:19189885 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Elena Fontanari, 2015. "Confined to the threshold," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 714-726, October.
    3. Daniel Leithold, 2016. "Asylum in Europe," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(4), pages 55-58, 02.
    4. Nihad El-Kayed & Ulrike Hamann, 2018. "Refugees’ Access to Housing and Residency in German Cities: Internal Border Regimes and Their Local Variations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 135-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martina Blank, 2019. "“Wir Schaffen Das!”? Spatial Pitfalls of Neighborhood-Based Refugee Reception in Germany—A Case Study of Frankfurt-Rödelheim," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Annegret Haase & Anika Schmidt & Dieter Rink & Sigrun Kabisch, 2020. "Leipzig’s Inner East as an Arrival Space? Exploring the Trajectory of a Diversifying Neighbourhood," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 89-102.
    3. Frank Eckardt, 2018. "European Cities Planning for Asylum," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 61-63.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kostas Kanellopoulos & Deniz Neriman Duru & Ulrike Zschache & Angelos Loukakis & Maria Kousis & Hans-Jörg Trenz, 2021. "Transnational Solidarity, Migration, and the Refugee Crisis: (In)Formal Organising and Political Environments in Greece, Germany, and Denmark," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 717-738, September.
    2. Fadi W Adel & Eden Bernstein & Michael Tcheyan & Shane Ali & Heidi Worabo & Moshtagh Farokhi & Andrew E Muck, 2019. "San Antonio refugees: Their demographics, healthcare profiles, and how to better serve them," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Martina Burmann & Madhinee Valeyatheepillay, 2017. "Asylum Recognition Rates in the Top 5 EU Countries," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 15(02), pages 48-50, August.
    4. Dino Pitoski & Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Peter Parycek, 2021. "Drivers of Human Migration: A Review of Scientific Evidence," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Regina C. Serpa, 2021. "The Exceptional Becomes Everyday: Border Control, Attrition and Exclusion from Within," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Thomas Grochtdreis & Hans-Helmut König & Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Judith Dams, 2022. "Health-Related Quality of Life of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Germany: a Cross-Sectional Study with Data from the German Socio-Economic Panel," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 109-127, February.
    7. Jure Leko, 2017. "Migration Regimes and the Translation of Human Rights: On the Struggles for Recognition of Romani Migrants in Germany," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 77-88.
    8. Charalampos Tsavdaroglou & Chrisa Giannopoulou & Chryssanthi Petropoulou & Ilias Pistikos, 2019. "Acts for Refugees’ Right to the City and Commoning Practices of Care-tizenship in Athens, Mytilene and Thessaloniki," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 119-130.
    9. d'Artis Kancs & Patrizio Lecca, 2018. "Long‐term social, economic and fiscal effects of immigration into the EU: The role of the integration policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 2599-2630, October.
    10. Philip L. Martin, 2016. "Europe’s Migration Crisis: An American Perspective," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 13(2), pages 307-319, May.
    11. Silvia Loi & Daniela Vono de Vilhena, 2020. "Exclusion through statistical invisibility. An exploration on what can be known through publicly available datasets on irregular migration and the health status of this population in Germany," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2020-009, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    12. Blesse, Sebastian & Boyer, Pierre C. & Heinemann, Friedrich & Janeba, Eckhard, 2016. "Searching for a Franco-German consensus on the future of Europe: Survey results for Bundestag, Assemblée Nationale and Sénat," ZEW policy briefs 5/2016, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Catherine Gladwell & Jennie Thomas & Georgina Chetwynd & Saliha Majeed & Carolyn Burke & Victoria Stubbs & Seemin Zahid, 2018. "The impact of educational achievement on the integration and wellbeing of Afghan refugee youth in the UK," WIDER Working Paper Series 57, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Sonja Fransen & Hein de Haas, 2022. "Trends and Patterns of Global Refugee Migration," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 48(1), pages 97-128, March.
    15. Reinke, Hannes & Goller, Michael, 2022. "Supporting young immigrants in their transition from school to work? A staff perspective on challenges of vocational integration classes," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 9(1), pages 92-119.
    16. Helbling, Marc & Simon, Stephan & Schmid, Samuel D., 2020. "Restricting immigration to foster migrant integration? A comparative study across 22 European countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46(13), pages 2603-2624.
    17. Christopher D. Smith & Jonas Helgertz & Kirk Scott, 2019. "Time and Generation: Parents’ Integration and Children’s School Performance in Sweden, 1989–2011," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(4), pages 719-750, October.
    18. Philipp Lutz & David Kaufmann & Anna Stünzi, 2020. "Humanitarian Protection as a European Public Good: The Strategic Role of States and Refugees," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 757-775, May.
    19. Bernt, Matthias & Hamann, Ulrike & El-Kayed, Nihad & Keskinkilic, Leoni, 2021. "Internal migration industries: Shaping the housing options for refugees at the local level," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online Fi.
    20. Hamza Fadil & Shen Yi, 2019. "Effectiveness of Regional Protection Program (RPP) Rezim - International Protection Regime - European Union (EU) in Germany," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(4), pages 164-180, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:116-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.