IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v2y2017i4p181-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Garden Cities of the 21st Century: A Sustainable Path to Suburban Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Vernet

    (École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Grenoble (ENSAG), Université Grenoble Alpes, France; French Environment and Energy Management Agency, France)

  • Anne Coste

    (École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Grenoble (ENSAG), Université Grenoble Alpes, France)

Abstract

The garden city is often presented as a low-density, unsustainable and space-consuming archetype of suburbanization (Duany, Roberts, & Tallen, 2014; Hall, 2014; Safdie & Kohn, 1997). It has been deliberately also misused by property developers for gated communities (Le Goix, 2003; Webster, 2001). But these projects have little in common with the original concept of garden cities. We argue that the original garden city, as a theory (Howard, 1898) and as experiments (Letchworth and Welwyn Garden Cities), is a precedent that can be used in a sustainable approach that addresses a range of issues and concerns, such as housing, governance, the economy, mobility, the community, agriculture, energy and health. The recent Wolfson Economics Prize (2014) and the many new garden cities and suburbs projects currently planned in the UK have demonstrated the resurgence of this model in the planning world, both in terms of theory and practice. In this paper, we explore its potential in the light of environmental challenges. We therefore suggest that as a model, it can in particular underpin the evolution of suburbs in an era of energy transition, since these areas require an ecosystemic rather than sectoral approach to design.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Vernet & Anne Coste, 2017. "Garden Cities of the 21st Century: A Sustainable Path to Suburban Reform," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(4), pages 181-196.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:4:p:181-196
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v2i4.1104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v2i4.1104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:4:p:181-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.