IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v2y2017i1p6-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Resources to Needs’: A Paradigm for Addressing the Potentiality of the Urban Volume

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Robert Doyle

    (Laboratory of Environmental and Urban Economics, École Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

Underground resources are often addressed only out of necessity, leading to conflicts between uses and missing opportunities for productive synergies. The Deep City project is exploring a paradigm of ‘resources to needs’, which considers resource potentials prior to specific urban projects or plans. Mapping is central to the project and has been explored in several cities around the world. The ‘resources to needs’ paradigm, however, has received little theoretical or philosophical attention. To think resources before needs challenges common urban normative models and the process-oriented thinking of mechanical and ecological paradigms popular today. Where current methods for mapping the underground tend to enroll elements in a particular performance or resource use, Deep City seeks to facilitate an intermediate stage in which resource potentials can coexist without any pre-existing interaction or relationship. To think about the urban volume this way, this article works with the informational motor proposed by French philosopher Michel Serres. The logics of substitution and circulation of the map and its contents helps to think an alternative form of mapping in which the map itself becomes a reservoir of potentiality for thinking the urban volume less in terms of predefined functions and processes than a mass to be collectively cultivated.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Robert Doyle, 2017. "‘Resources to Needs’: A Paradigm for Addressing the Potentiality of the Urban Volume," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(1), pages 6-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:1:p:6-18
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v2i1.759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/759
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v2i1.759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v2:y:2017:i:1:p:6-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.