IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i4p79-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Colonial Urban Development and Planning in Cyprus: Shifting Visions and Realities of Early Suburbia

Author

Listed:
  • Byron Ioannou

    (Department of Architecture, School of Engineering, Frederick University, Cyprus)

Abstract

The paper studies the evolution of early suburban neighbourhoods in the context of the post-colonial urban development and planning. The Planning Report of the colonial Government of Cyprus in 1959 examines the foundations of urban development in Cyprus and at the same time implies a surprisingly sustainable vision for the future of planning. Despite this early intentions and guidance, the urban districts developed far from being sustainable under widely accepted criteria and indicators (participation, effectiveness of planning and development control, sprawl, character and identity, green). The basic hypothesis is that planning has proved insufficient in providing rational urban development. The paper outlines the roots of the planning shortcomings during the last fifty years. British perceptions on planning of the first half of the 20th century influenced the 1959 Report, which affected, in turns, the legislation which followed. It is explained why development constrains and land market restrictions prevented the implementation of rational key ideas, and sustainable visions throughout the years. The paper concludes in attempting to visualize these dynamic processes at the early suburban neighbourhoods and measure distortions on densities, green spaces and layouts by taking an early suburban district as a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Byron Ioannou, 2016. "Post-Colonial Urban Development and Planning in Cyprus: Shifting Visions and Realities of Early Suburbia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 79-88.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:79-88
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i4.768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/768
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v1i4.768?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:79-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.