IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i4p42-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clumsy City by Design—A Theory for Jane Jacobs’ Imperfect Cities?

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Maria Schmitt

    (Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, Austria)

  • Thomas Hartmann

    (Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands and University Jan Evangelista Purkyne, Czech Republic)

Abstract

How do different concepts of justice correspond with the principles of diversity in cities introduced by Jane Jacobs? This contribution connects Jane Jacobs’ ideas on the diverse city with Mary Douglas’ Cultural Theory and its concept of clumsy solutions. According to Douglas’ Cultural Theory, every social situation can be described in terms of the four ideal-typical “rationalities”: individualism, egalitarianism, hierarchism, and fatalism. These four rationalities are again linked to different concepts of justice: libertarian, utilitarian, or social justice. Douglas’ Cultural Theory assumes that in every social situation all four of those rationalities emerge in some way and concludes that if a situation is not poly-rational, it is less robust. This opts for imperfect and “clumsy solutions”. It is argued that clumsy solutions, the four rationalities and related concepts fit Jane Jacobs’ claim for more diversity in urban design. This essentially calls for imperfect cities by design, ‘built’ by Jacobs’ generators for diversity. Although this outcome might not be revolutionary in the current debates about urban design, the concept of clumsy solutions provide a foundation for Jane Jacobs’ atheoretical claim for a diverse city. This contributes to new reflections on the urban planning paradigms of Jane Jacobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Maria Schmitt & Thomas Hartmann, 2016. "Clumsy City by Design—A Theory for Jane Jacobs’ Imperfect Cities?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 42-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:42-50
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v1i4.732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/732
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v1i4.732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v1:y:2016:i:4:p:42-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.