IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v9y2021i4p36-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demystifying Subjective Well‐Being of Academically At‐Risk Students: Case Study of a Chinese High School

Author

Listed:
  • Tianjun Cheng

    (School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, China / Centre for Sociology of Education, Nanjing Normal University, China)

  • Jin Jin

    (School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University, China)

  • Junjun Chen

    (Department of Education Policy and Leadership, Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Student subjective well‐being (SWB) is increasingly incorporated into today’s education policies and positive education movements. There is a growing interest in how well schools promote student well‐being, especially for disadvantaged students, e.g., the academically at‐risk, and which factors affect this process. This study investigates how teachers and academically at‐risk students perceive SWB and its influential precursors in a high school in China. The influential precursors in the present research were allocated into four dimensions, namely contextual factors, school factors, family factors, and individual factors. Via semi‐structured individual interviews with 12 teachers and 18 students for about one hour and content analysis of the interview data, the responses revealed that while students tended to have a superficial understanding of well‐being, traditional concepts about studying, blind filial piety, peer relations, and self‐efficacy were important factors shaping and influencing their SWB. These findings can inform the development of inclusive education policies concerning student SWB and the intervention and prevention systems of schools in both local and international contexts. Recommendations for organising lectures for parents and implementing programs providing instruction on SWB‐related skills for students are proposed to support academically at‐risk students, aiming to achieve the educational goal of success for all.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianjun Cheng & Jin Jin & Junjun Chen, 2021. "Demystifying Subjective Well‐Being of Academically At‐Risk Students: Case Study of a Chinese High School," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 36-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:36-46
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i4.4572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v9i4.4572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:36-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.