IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v4y2016i4p125-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations between Disability and ‘Being Human’

Author

Listed:
  • Paul van Trigt

    (Institute for History, Leiden University, The Netherlands)

  • Jacqueline Kool

    (Disability Studies in the Netherlands, The Netherlands)

  • Alice Schippers

    (Disability Studies in the Netherlands, The Netherlands, and Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This editorial presents the theme and approach of the themed issue “Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations between Disability and ‘Being Human’”. The way in which the concept of humanity is or must be related to disability is critically investigated from different disciplinary perspectives in the themed issue, which is, moreover, situated in the field of disability studies and related to discussions about posthumanism. The argument is made that humanity is a concept that needs to be constantly reflected upon from a disability studies perspective. Finally, the contributions of the themed issue are briefly outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul van Trigt & Jacqueline Kool & Alice Schippers, 2016. "Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations between Disability and ‘Being Human’," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 125-128.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v4:y:2016:i:4:p:125-128
    DOI: 10.17645/si.v4i4.754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/754
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.v4i4.754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v4:y:2016:i:4:p:125-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.