IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v3y2015i5p1-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to the Special Issue “Talking about Roma: Implications for Social Inclusion”

Author

Listed:
  • Eben Friedman

    (Independent Consultant and Senior Non-resident Research Associate, European Centre for Minority Issues, Germany)

Abstract

By the last decade of the twentieth century, official discourse calling for the elimination of Roma had been largely replaced by approaches aimed at inclusion. Contemporary approaches of this kind can be roughly divided into those which emphasize human rights as a basis for measures to improve the Roma’s situation and those rooted in the proposition that improvements in the situation of Roma can be expected to provide economic benefits for the general populations of the countries in which Roma live. The contributions to this special issue critically examine public discourses from throughout Europe which are ostensibly aimed at promoting the social inclusion of Roma. While the fact that the discourses treated fit broadly within human rights and/or economic paradigms allows the articles to speak to one another in various ways, the articles also exhibit a wide range of variation in approach as well as geographical focus. Whereas the first four articles deal directly with issues of definition in relation to Roma, a second group of contributions compares developments across multiple countries or institutions. The last four articles each treat a single country, with the final article narrowing the focus further to a single city.

Suggested Citation

  • Eben Friedman, 2015. "Introduction to the Special Issue “Talking about Roma: Implications for Social Inclusion”," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(5), pages 1-4.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:1-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/450
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Zhihu & Li, Zhi & Wu, Te & Wang, Long, 2013. "Role of recommendation in spatial public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(9), pages 2038-2045.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Siyuan & Zhang, Chunyan & Li, Kun & Zhang, Jianlei, 2022. "Exploring the inducement for social dilemma and cooperation promotion mechanisms in structured populations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Tzu-Chieh Lin & Kung Jeng Wang, 2021. "Project-based maturity assessment model for smart transformation in Taiwanese enterprises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Yin, Likang & Deng, Yong, 2018. "Measuring transferring similarity via local information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 498(C), pages 102-115.
    4. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Individual choice and reputation distribution of cooperative behaviors among heterogeneous groups," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-46.
    5. Peng Lu & Xiaoping Zheng, 2015. "Social Stratification and Cooperative Behavior in Spatial Prisoners' Dilemma Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Lu, Peng & Wang, Fang, 2015. "Heterogeneity of inferring reputation probability in cooperative behaviors for the spatial prisoners’ dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 433(C), pages 367-378.
    7. Ioannis Dionysopoulos, 2013. "Olympic Games and their Commercialization," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(4).
    8. Shuhua Chang & Zhipeng Zhang & Yu Li & Yu E Wu & Yunya Xie, 2018. "Investment preference promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Imitating winner or sympathizing loser? Quadratic effects on cooperative behavior in prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 327-337.
    10. Wang, Yongjie & Chen, Tong, 2015. "Heuristics guide cooperative behaviors in public goods game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 439(C), pages 59-65.
    11. Lu, Peng, 2015. "Learn good from bad: Effects of good and bad neighbors in spatial prisoners’ dilemma games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 351-358.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:1-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.