IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v13y2025a8766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality at the Transition to Higher Education in Germany: Social Differences by Prior Educational Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Heiko Quast

    (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, Germany)

  • Heike Spangenberg

    (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, Germany)

  • Hanna Mentges

    (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, Germany)

  • Jessica Ordemann

    (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, Germany)

  • Sandra Buchholz

    (German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, Germany)

Abstract

In this article, we assess the importance of alternative pathways via vocational schools and vocational education and training (VET) for social differences in the transition into higher education in Germany. Drawing on data from the DZHW Panel of School Leavers 2018, we use sequence analysis to identify both classical and alternative pathways to obtaining a higher education entrance certificate. We then apply logistic regressions and decomposition techniques to examine the variation in the probability of studying for each pathway compared to the classical pathway through general upper secondary school. Finally, we investigate the underlying reasons for these social differences. We show that the graduates in our analysis take six distinct and socially selective pathways to a higher education entrance certificate, four of which have strong vocational elements. All pathways differ in their study probability: Graduates of almost all alternative educational pathways are less likely to opt for higher education than graduates of the classical pathway. However, this is not solely due to the different composition of graduates in terms of social origin and school performance. Although graduates from less privileged social backgrounds and with lower school performance are disproportionately represented in the alternative pathways, they also differ in their assessment of the costs, benefits, and probabilities of success of investing in higher education. Finally, differences in study probability can be explained by several theoretical mechanisms, the individual explanatory power of which varies according to the pathways.

Suggested Citation

  • Heiko Quast & Heike Spangenberg & Hanna Mentges & Jessica Ordemann & Sandra Buchholz, 2025. "Inequality at the Transition to Higher Education in Germany: Social Differences by Prior Educational Pathways," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:8766
    DOI: 10.17645/si.8766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/8766
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.8766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:8766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.