IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v9y2021i4p53-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Japan’s Climate Change Discourse: Toward Climate Securitisation?

Author

Listed:
  • Florentine Koppenborg

    (Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University Munich, Germany)

  • Ulv Hanssen

    (Faculty of Law, Soka University, Japan)

Abstract

This article situates Japan in the international climate security debate by analysing competing climate change discourses. In 2020, for the first time, the Japanese Ministry of the Environment included the term “climate crisis” ( kikō kiki ) in its annual white paper, and the Japanese parliament adopted a “climate emergency declaration” ( kikō hijō jitai sengen ). Does this mean that Japan’s climate discourse is turning toward the securitisation of climate change? Drawing on securitisation theory, this article investigates whether we are seeing the emergence of a climate change securitisation discourse that treats climate change as a security issue rather than a conventional political issue. The analysis focuses on different stakeholders in Japan’s climate policy: the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the parliament, the Cabinet, and sub- and non-state actors. Through a discourse analysis of ministry white papers and publications by other stakeholders, the article identifies a burgeoning securitisation discourse that challenges, albeit moderately, the status quo of incrementalism and inaction in Japan’s climate policy. This article further highlights Japan’s position in the rapidly evolving global debate on the urgency of climate action and provides explanations for apparent changes and continuities in Japan’s climate change discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Florentine Koppenborg & Ulv Hanssen, 2021. "Japan’s Climate Change Discourse: Toward Climate Securitisation?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 53-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:53-64
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i4.4419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4419
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v9i4.4419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:53-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.