IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a9196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unequal Turnout Among the Newly Enfranchised: The Role of Political Efficacy

Author

Listed:
  • Susanne Garritzmann

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Sigrid Roßteutscher

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Arndt Leininger

    (Institute of Political Science, Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany)

  • Birgit Becker

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Thorsten Faas

    (Otto Suhr Institute for Political Science, Free University of Berlin, Germany)

  • Max P. Jansen

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Armin Schäfer

    (Institute of Political Science, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany)

Abstract

Unequal political participation increasingly challenges democracies. The turnout gap is particularly large among younger voters, with severe implications for future developments of democratic representation, legitimacy, and quality. This article focuses on the role of political efficacy beliefs in explaining unequal turnout among newly enfranchised citizens. We argue that internal political efficacy beliefs are particularly important for turnout among the newly enfranchised from lower-class backgrounds, as they lack alternative mobilizing factors such as politically aware and active parents, political knowledge, and mobilizing networks. Furthermore, we argue that once these voters successfully turn out in their first election, they are as likely as those from higher-class backgrounds to turn out in their second election. We empirically test these arguments using original longitudinal data on newly enfranchised citizens from three German federal states (Bundesländer). Overall, our results support the argument: Political efficacy beliefs are a stronger predictor of first turnout among young adults from disadvantaged backgrounds compared to those from more advantaged backgrounds, and those who do turn out are as likely as those with higher-class backgrounds to turn out in their second election. This highlights the relevance of political efficacy beliefs in the (re)production of persisting political inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanne Garritzmann & Sigrid Roßteutscher & Arndt Leininger & Birgit Becker & Thorsten Faas & Max P. Jansen & Armin Schäfer, 2025. "Unequal Turnout Among the Newly Enfranchised: The Role of Political Efficacy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9196
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.9196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.9196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Macdonald, 2020. "Class Attitudes, Political Knowledge, and Support for Redistribution in an Era of Inequality," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(2), pages 960-977, March.
    2. Schaub, Max, 2021. "Acute Financial Hardship and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from the Sequence of Bank Working Days," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1258-1274, November.
    3. Schaub, Max, 2021. "Acute Financial Hardship and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from the Sequence of Bank Working Days," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 115(4), pages 1258-1274.
    4. Akee, Randall & Copeland, William & Holbein, John B. & Simeonova, Emilia, 2020. "Human Capital and Voting Behavior across Generations: Evidence from an Income Intervention," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 609-616, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salomo Hirvonen & Jerome Schafer & Janne Tukiainen, 2022. "Policy Feedback and Civic Engagement: Evidence from the Finnish Basic Income Experiment," Discussion Papers 155, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    2. Schaub, Max, 2021. "Acute Financial Hardship and Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence from the Sequence of Bank Working Days," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 115(4), pages 1258-1274.
    3. Miguel Calvin & Pilar Rey del Castillo, 2023. "A Bayesian Networks Approach for Analyzing Voting Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 10855, CESifo.
    4. Kris‐Stella Trump, 2023. "Income inequality is unrelated to perceived inequality and support for redistribution," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(2), pages 180-188, March.
    5. Sebastian Jungkunz & Paul Marx, 2021. "Income Changes Do Not Influence Political Participation: Evidence from Comparative Panel Data," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1129, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    6. Nyagweta, David Tinashe, 2024. "Awareness of institutions, and associated factors: An inquiry of Chapter 9 and 10 institutions in South Africa," MPRA Paper 122443, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Fiorini, Luciana C. & Jetter, Michael & Parmeter, Christopher F. & Parsons, Christopher, 2020. "The Effect of Community Size on Electoral Preferences: Evidence From Post-WWII Southern Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 13724, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Adam Crepelle & Paasha Mahdavi & Dominic Parker, 2024. "Effects of per capita payments on governance: evidence from tribal casinos," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 199(3), pages 319-340, June.
    9. Oskari Harjunen & Tuukka Saarimaa & Janne Tukiainen, 2021. "Love Thy (Elected) Neighbor? Residential Segregation, Political Representation and Local Public Goods," Discussion Papers 138, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    10. Jungkunz, Sebastian & Marx, Paul, 2021. "Income Changes Do Not Influence Political Participation: Evidence from Comparative Panel Data," IZA Discussion Papers 14198, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Jungkunz, Sebastian & Marx, Paul, 2021. "Income changes do not influence political participation: Evidence from comparative panel data," ifso working paper series 11, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.