Author
Listed:
- Hannah Decker
(Department of Human‐Centered Computing and Cognitive Science (HCCS), University of Duisburg‐Essen, Germany)
- Daniel Angus
(Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
- Axel Bruns
(Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
- Ehsan Dehghan
(Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
- Phoebe Matich
(Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
- Jane Tan
(Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
- Laura Vodden
(Digital Media Research Center, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Abstract
This study explores the diversity of topics in political campaign communication on social media during the 2022 Australian federal election. While political campaigns on social media are often associated with both persuasive and mobilising appeals, this research focuses on understanding the differences in persuasive content by comparing organic (non-targeted) and paid (targeted) political communication. Analysing the Australian context, which follows a Westminster system, with compulsory voting, we utilise data from the federal election 2022 to investigate how political actors employ persuasive communication strategies. Through topic modelling, we examine whether distinct themes vary in content and prevalence between organic and paid social media content disseminated by political parties and candidates. Our analysis revealed that the differences in topic diversity between paid and organic content do not seem to be substantial, despite popular concerns about higher personalisation due to advertising targeting which could lead to information fragmentation of the electorate. Both types of content predominantly focus on core political topics, aligning with party ideologies and include overall campaign information (e.g., on election procedures). However, government critique emerges as a distinct topic in both organic and paid content signalling the usage of negative campaigning to weaken opposing parties. In conclusion, this study suggests that the strategic manipulation of the electorate through social media during the Australian federal election in 2022 was limited. Nonetheless, the prevalence of negative appeals towards the government and opposing parties raises questions about the potential impact on citizens’ trust in democracy and institutions.
Suggested Citation
Hannah Decker & Daniel Angus & Axel Bruns & Ehsan Dehghan & Phoebe Matich & Jane Tan & Laura Vodden, 2024.
"Topic Diversity in Social Media Campaigning: A Study of the 2022 Australian Federal Election,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:8155
DOI: 10.17645/pag.8155
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:8155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.