Author
Listed:
- Ana Sofia Ribeiro
(Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal)
- Vladislava Lendzhova
(South‐West University “Neofit Rilski,” Bulgaria)
- Sonata Vyšniauskienė
(Institute of Sociology and Social Work, Vilnius University, Lithuania)
- Tatiana Ferreira
(School of Education, Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, Portugal)
- João Carlos Sousa
(Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal)
- Isabel Roque
(Institute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Portugal)
- Kerli Kõiv
(Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Estonia)
- Katrin Saks
(Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Estonia)
- Omeed Agahi
(Department of Education and Psychology, University of Girona, Spain)
- Òscar Prieto‐Flores
(Department of Education and Psychology, University of Girona, Spain)
- Niall O’Higgins
(International Labour Organization, Switzerland / Department of Economic Sciences and Statistics (DIES), University of Salerno, Italy)
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic provoked critical changes to welfare in Europe, requiring the dematerialisation of programmes and services while relying mainly on remote support. This study aims to present insights into how European public employment services have coped and adapted to the pandemic challenges, particularly regarding the digitalisation and delivery of services to young people in rural areas. It focuses on three case studies from distinct European regions: Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania. It is based on an exploratory survey of public employment services national offices and qualitative data collected from public employment services offices in rural settings. It highlights the advantages and dangers of the adoption of digitalisation processes, namely considering literacy and accessibility in diverse contexts. It concludes that despite cultural and regional differences, all three countries evidenced an acceleration in service provision due to digitalisation and were capable of adjusting their practices to remote delivery. However, rural areas faced delays due to poor infrastructure, and after the pandemic, public employment privileged on-site delivery, since it is considered more effective in the training and counselling of young people.
Suggested Citation
Ana Sofia Ribeiro & Vladislava Lendzhova & Sonata Vyšniauskienė & Tatiana Ferreira & João Carlos Sousa & Isabel Roque & Kerli Kõiv & Katrin Saks & Omeed Agahi & Òscar Prieto‐Flores & Niall O’Higgins, 2024.
"Public Employment Services' Responses to the Pandemic: Examples from Portugal, Bulgaria, and Lithuania,"
Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:7437
DOI: 10.17645/pag.7437
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v12:y:2024:a:7437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.