IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i3p16-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voter Disenchantment in the Aftermath of the 2005 EU Constitutional Referendum in France

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Sliwa Ruiz

    (Department of Global Economics and Business, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Lukas Linsi

    (Department of International Relations and International Organization, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Pascal Jaupart

    (World Bank, USA)

Abstract

In a popular referendum in 2005, French voters rejected their country’s adoption of a proposed EU Constitution. Yet, in seeming defiance of the popular vote, the government subsequently proceeded to implement the core of the legislation without consulting the public again. This article empirically examines the electoral impacts of these events. We build a comprehensive fine-grained dataset of nationwide election results for more than 36,000 metropolitan French municipalities. Employing cross-sectional analysis for all national elections held in the decade after the referendum vote, we find that the strength of a municipality’s rejection of the EU Constitution in 2005 is associated with a lower voter turnout, higher shares of blank votes, and larger gains for anti-system parties in subsequent elections. The findings are robust to various modelling choices and the inclusion of a large array of controls. The results indicate that bypassing a popular vote could entail protracted adverse effects on the quality of democratic participation and deliberation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Sliwa Ruiz & Lukas Linsi & Pascal Jaupart, 2023. "Voter Disenchantment in the Aftermath of the 2005 EU Constitutional Referendum in France," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 16-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:3:p:16-28
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v11i3.6675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6675
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v11i3.6675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v11:y:2023:i:3:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.