IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v10y2022i4p311-324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Protest Only Negative? Examining the Effect of Emotions and Affective Polarization on Protest Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Bettarelli

    (Centre d’Étude de la Vie Politique (CEVIPOL), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Caroline Close

    (Centre d’Étude de la Vie Politique (CEVIPOL), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Emilie van Haute

    (Centre d’Étude de la Vie Politique (CEVIPOL), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium)

Abstract

This contribution sheds light on the link between affect and protest behaviors. Using data from a voter survey conducted around the 2019 elections in Belgium, we examine two dimensions of affect: a vertical one, i.e., negative and positive emotions towards politics in general, and a horizontal one, i.e., affective polarization towards fellow citizens. Our findings make three important contributions. First, we identify five distinct classes of respondents depending on their emotions towards politics (apathetic, angry, hopeful, highly emotional, and average). Second, we demonstrate that the combination of both anger and hope is more strongly associated with protest action than anger alone. By contrast, apathy, characterized by an absence of emotions towards politics, is negatively related to protest behavior. Third, we show that affective polarization is a key driver of protest behavior per se. We also show that the two dimensions of affect have distinctive effects. Yet they interact: Affective polarization towards political opponents compensates for the absence of emotions towards politics in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Bettarelli & Caroline Close & Emilie van Haute, 2022. "Is Protest Only Negative? Examining the Effect of Emotions and Affective Polarization on Protest Behaviour," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 311-324.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:311-324
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v10i4.5665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5665
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:311-324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.