Author
Listed:
- Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández
(Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Australia / School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
- Joanne E. Gray
(Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Australia / School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
- Louisa Bartolo
(Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Australia / School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
- Jean Burgess
(Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Australia / School of Communication, Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
- Nicolas Suzor
(Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Australia / School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Australia)
Abstract
YouTube’s “up next” feature algorithmically selects, suggests, and displays videos to watch after the one that is currently playing. This feature has been criticized for limiting users’ exposure to a range of diverse media content and information sources; meanwhile, YouTube has reported that they have implemented various technical and policy changes to address these concerns. However, there is little publicly available data to support either the existing concerns or YouTube’s claims of having addressed them. Drawing on the idea of “platform observability,” this article combines computational and qualitative methods to investigate the types of content that the algorithms underpinning YouTube’s “up next” feature amplify over time, using three keyword search terms associated with sociocultural issues where concerns have been raised about YouTube’s role: “coronavirus,” “feminism,” and “beauty.” Over six weeks, we collected the videos (and their metadata, including channel IDs) that were highly ranked in the search results for each keyword, as well as the highly ranked recommendations associated with the videos. We repeated this exercise for three steps in the recommendation chain and then examined patterns in the recommended videos (and the channels that uploaded the videos) for each query and their variation over time. We found evidence of YouTube’s stated efforts to boost “authoritative” media outlets, but at the same time, misleading and controversial content continues to be recommended. We also found that while algorithmic recommendations offer diversity in videos over time, there are clear “winners” at the channel level that are given a visibility boost in YouTube’s “up next” feature. However, these impacts are attenuated differently depending on the nature of the issue.
Suggested Citation
Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández & Joanne E. Gray & Louisa Bartolo & Jean Burgess & Nicolas Suzor, 2021.
"What’s “Up Next”? Investigating Algorithmic Recommendations on YouTube Across Issues and Over Time,"
Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 234-249.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:meanco:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:234-249
DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i4.4184
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v9:y:2021:i:4:p:234-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.