IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i1p177-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science Slams as Edutainment: A Reception Study

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Niemann

    (National Institute for Science Communication gGmbH, Germany)

  • Laura Bittner

    (Department for Science Communication, Institute of Technology Futures, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany)

  • Philipp Schrögel

    (Department for Science Communication, Institute of Technology Futures, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany)

  • Christiane Hauser

    (Department for Science Communication, Institute of Technology Futures, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany)

Abstract

Science slams are a prominent form of science communication especially in Germany that seeks to entertain. While some view science slams as an excellent vehicle for disseminating knowledge, others argue that the imperative to entertain undermines the scientific value of this form of presentation. Drawing on empirical data from three science slam events, this explorative study examines how audiences and presenters perceive the science slam, particularly as it relates to entertainment and the communication of scientific knowledge. Our multi-method analysis includes audience surveys (n = 469), an eye-tracking study, and interviews with science slammers (n = 18). Our results show that the main reason audiences attend a science slam is for entertainment, yet they also have a strong interest in scientific content. Assessing the slammers’ aspirations concerning the audience, we find entertainment to be an important part, but the motivation to impart scientific knowledge is key for most. When asked to evaluate individual presentations (n = 20), spectators tended to rate both the entertainment and scientific value of the presentations as high. However, in terms of visual attention within individual presentations, spectators spent more time considering scientific content than entertainment content. Overall, we do not find evidence for the common claim that the focus on entertainment undermines the scientific value of science slam presentations—rather, entertainment and scientific content are combined to produce “edutainment” in a positive sense.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Niemann & Laura Bittner & Philipp Schrögel & Christiane Hauser, 2020. "Science Slams as Edutainment: A Reception Study," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 177-190.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:1:p:177-190
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i1.2459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2459
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i1.2459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:1:p:177-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.