IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i1p101-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between Evidence and Emotions: Emotional Appeals in Science Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Taddicken

    (Department of Communication and Media Sciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Anne Reif

    (Department of Communication and Media Sciences, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany)

Abstract

In the field of science communication, there is currently a great deal of discussion on how individuals can be reached, not only through fact-oriented communication, but also through emotional appeals and ‘edutainment’ approaches. This discussion has been further intensified by the changing conditions of new media environments. From an academic viewpoint, the discussion is often met with scepticism. However, categorical statements about a supposed dichotomy of emotion and rationality are misleading. What is needed are differentiated arguments and analyses. Nevertheless, emotions in science communication are an often overseen research field. With this thematic issue, we seek to enrich the scientific discourse by providing research from authors coming from different perspectives using different concepts, methods, and cases. In this editorial, we summarise the contribution of ten different articles on three levels: (1) emotions of science communicators, (2) emotional(ised) content, and (3) emotions of science communication audiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Taddicken & Anne Reif, 2020. "Between Evidence and Emotions: Emotional Appeals in Science Communication," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 101-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:1:p:101-106
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i1.2934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2934
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i1.2934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:1:p:101-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.