IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v7y2019i3p157-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Newsworthiness and the Public’s Response in Russian Social Media: A Comparison of State and Private News Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Darja Judina

    (Center for Sociological and Internet Research, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia)

  • Konstantin Platonov

    (Center for Sociological and Internet Research, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia)

Abstract

Social media have become one of the most important news delivery channels due to their interactivity and large audiences. The content published by news organizations on social networking sites is of particular value to sociologists, because it allows measurement of users’ attitude to certain events. However, we understand that the media choose which events become news in accordance with certain criteria, such as news values. In this study, we decided to examine how news values determine the public’s response as expressed by likes, reposts, and comments. To analyze the characteristics of different media and their audiences, we selected four popular newsgroups on the social networking site Vkontakte: TASS and Russia Today, representing the state media, alongside RBC and Meduza, representing the private media. The posts of the selected newsgroups were coded and analyzed by means of Harcup and O’Neill taxonomy of values (2016). The study showed that news organizations tend to have preferences for some news values rather than others. Regression analysis revealed positive relationships between 1) the sharing of likes and good and entertaining content, 2) the sharing of comments and the presence of celebrities or conflicts in news, 3) the sharing of reposts and comments and significant events. An unexpected discovery was a negative dependency between the number of comments and the presence of exclusive content.

Suggested Citation

  • Darja Judina & Konstantin Platonov, 2019. "Newsworthiness and the Public’s Response in Russian Social Media: A Comparison of State and Private News Organizations," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 157-166.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v7:y:2019:i:3:p:157-166
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i3.1910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1910
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v7i3.1910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v7:y:2019:i:3:p:157-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.