IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v6y2018i4p111-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Neta Kligler-Vilenchik

    (Department of Communication and Journalism, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel)

Abstract

Research on participation is currently characterized by a trend towards studying its “darker” sides. In this commentary, I make an argument for why we should keep studying good participation. In addition, I claim that the flipside of studying exceptional case studies of participation shouldn’t be only focusing on dark participation, but on everyday, mundane forms of participation, that may happen in surprising contexts (such as non-proprietary platforms) and may take different shapes. To make these claims, I introduce a case study of “good participation” in news production processes, and explain why it may merit this distinction. I then use a three-pronged analogy to the cognate field of political participation to show what it can tell us about good—and everyday—participation in the news.

Suggested Citation

  • Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v6:y:2018:i:4:p:111-114
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v6i4.1744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1744
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avery E. Holton & Valerie Belair-Gagnon, 2018. "Strangers to the Game? Interlopers, Intralopers, and Shifting News Production," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 70-78.
    2. C. W. Anderson & Matthias Revers, 2018. "From Counter-Power to Counter-Pepe: The Vagaries of Participatory Epistemology in a Digital Age," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 24-25.
    3. Sue Robinson & Yidong Wang, 2018. "Networked News Participation: Future Pathways," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 91-102.
    4. Seth C. Lewis & Logan Molyneux, 2018. "A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 11-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikki Usher & Matt Carlson, 2018. "The Midlife Crisis of the Network Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 107-110.
    2. James E. Katz, 2018. "Commentary on News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 103-106.
    3. Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    4. James E. Katz, 2018. "Commentary on News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 103-106.
    5. Oscar Westlund & Mats Ekström, 2018. "News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10.
    6. Nikki Usher & Matt Carlson, 2018. "The Midlife Crisis of the Network Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 107-110.
    7. Sue Robinson & Yidong Wang, 2018. "Networked News Participation: Future Pathways," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 91-102.
    8. Oscar Westlund & Mats Ekström, 2018. "News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10.
    9. Katherine M. Engelke, 2019. "Online Participatory Journalism: A Systematic Literature Review," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 31-44.
    10. Katherine M. Engelke, 2019. "Online Participatory Journalism: A Systematic Literature Review," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 31-44.
    11. Mats Ekström & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "The Dislocation of News Journalism: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Epistemologies of Digital Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 259-270.
    12. Mats Ekström & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "The Dislocation of News Journalism: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Epistemologies of Digital Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 259-270.
    13. Sue Robinson & Yidong Wang, 2018. "Networked News Participation: Future Pathways," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 91-102.
    14. Ester Appelgren & Carl-Gustav Lindén, 2020. "Data Journalism as a Service: Digital Native Data Journalism Expertise and Product Development," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 62-72.
    15. Mark Badham & Markus Mykkänen, 2022. "A Relational Approach to How Media Engage With Their Audiences in Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 54-65.
    16. Sherwin Chua & Andrew Duffy, 2019. "Friend, Foe or Frenemy? Traditional Journalism Actors’ Changing Attitudes towards Peripheral Players and Their Innovations," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 112-122.
    17. Alfred Hermida & Mary Lynn Young, 2019. "From Peripheral to Integral? A Digital-Born Journalism Not for Profit in a Time of Crises," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 92-102.
    18. Tatiana Santos Gonçalves & Pedro Jerónimo & João Carlos Correia, 2021. "Local News and Geolocation Technology in the Case of Portugal," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.
    19. Avery E. Holton & Valerie Belair-Gagnon, 2018. "Strangers to the Game? Interlopers, Intralopers, and Shifting News Production," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 70-78.
    20. Aljosha Karim Schapals & Phoebe Maares & Folker Hanusch, 2019. "Working on the Margins: Comparative Perspectives on the Roles and Motivations of Peripheral Actors in Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 19-30.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v6:y:2018:i:4:p:111-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.