IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v5y2017i1p7-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outrage without Consequences? Post-Snowden Discourses and Governmental Practice in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Steiger

    (Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University, Germany)

  • Wolf J. Schünemann

    (Institute of Social Sciences, Hildesheim University, Germany)

  • Katharina Dimmroth

    (Institute of Political Science, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Germany)

Abstract

In 2013 Edward Snowden’s disclosures of mass surveillance performed by US intelligence agencies seriously irritated politicians and citizens around the globe. This holds particularly true for privacy-sensitive communities in Germany. However, while the public was outraged, intelligence and security cooperation between the United States and Germany has been marked by continuity instead of disruption. The rather insubstantial debate over a so-called “No-Spy-Agreement” between the United States and Germany is just one telling example of the disconnect between public discourse and governmental action, as is the recent intelligence service regulation. This article considers why and where the “Snowden effect” has been lost on different discursive levels. We analyze and compare parliamentary and governmental discourses in the two years after the Snowden revelations by using the Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD) to dissect the group-specific statements and interpretive schemes in 287 official documents by the German Bundestag, selected ministries and agencies within the policy subsystem. These will be analyzed in reference to actual governmental practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Steiger & Wolf J. Schünemann & Katharina Dimmroth, 2017. "Outrage without Consequences? Post-Snowden Discourses and Governmental Practice in Germany," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 7-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:7-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/814
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thiel, Thorsten, 2019. "Souveränität: Dynamisierung und Kontestation in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-60.
    2. Berg, Sebastian & Thiel, Thorsten, 2019. "Widerstand und die Formierung von Ordnung in der digitalen Konstellation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 67-86.
    3. Pohle, Julia & Van Audenhove, Leo, 2017. "Post-Snowden internet policy: between public outrage, resistance and policy change," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6.
    4. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Digital sovereignty," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19.
    5. Julia Pohle & Leo Van Audenhove, 2017. "Post-Snowden Internet Policy: Between Public Outrage, Resistance and Policy Change," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6.
    6. Berg, Sebastian & Rakowski, Niklas & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Die digitale Konstellation. Eine Positionsbestimmung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 171-191.
    7. Hösl, Maximilian, 2019. "Semantics of the internet: a political history," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(3-4), pages 275-292.
    8. Pohle, Julia & Thiel, Thorsten, 2021. "Digital Sovereignty," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 47-67.
    9. Pohle, Julia & Voelsen, Daniel, 2022. "Centrality and power. The struggle over the techno‐political configuration of the Internet and the global digital order," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 13-27.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:7-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.