IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v4y2016i4p66-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Research Ethics to Researching Ethics in an Online Specific Context

Author

Listed:
  • Sari Östman

    (Faculty of Humanities, University of Turku, Finland)

  • Riikka Turtiainen

    (Faculty of Humanities, University of Turku, Finland)

Abstract

Along with the rise of a research field called digital humanities, online specific research ethics plays an especially significant role. Research on the same (Internet related) topic is usually multidisciplinary, and understanding research ethics even inside the same research community may vary essentially. It is important to recognise and pay attention to online specific contexts as well as the researcher’s own disciplinary background. In this empirical research paper, we will first sum up our previous work. Currently, we are working on a model which will help in positioning multidisciplinary researchers as ethical actors based on their research topics and backgrounds. In this article, we will present this model with a demonstration of the empirical data collected as part of a Finnish research project called Citizen Mindscapes, which concerns the cultures and history of Finnish discussion forums. We argue that in Finland, and probably also worldwide, online research ethics is in a phase where the focus should be moving from defining the ethical guidelines to studying research ethics as such. We will also discuss how the model will be further developed in an in-depth empirical process.

Suggested Citation

  • Sari Östman & Riikka Turtiainen, 2016. "From Research Ethics to Researching Ethics in an Online Specific Context," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 66-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:66-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/571
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malin Fecke & Ada Fehr & Daniela Schlütz & Arne Freya Zillich, 2022. "The Ethics of Gatekeeping: How Guarding Access Influences Digital Child and Youth Research," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 361-370.
    2. Niina Sormanen & Epp Lauk, 2016. "Issues of Ethics and Methods in Studying Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 63-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:66-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.