IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v3y2015i4p45-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One Country, Two Polarised Audiences: Estonia and the Deficiency of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive

Author

Listed:
  • Andres Jõesaar

    (Baltic Film and Media School, Tallinn University, Estonia)

Abstract

This article argues that until recent times, the Estonian media policy has mainly been interpreted as an economic issue and it did not account for the strategic need to build a comprehensive media field to serve all groups in society. This has happened despite the fact the Estonian media policy is in line with the European Union (EU) media policy, which should ensure freedom of information, diversity of opinion and media pluralism. Findings of the Estonian case study show that despite these noble aims, Estonia has two radically different information fields: one for Estonian speaking audiences and one for Russian speakers. Events in Ukraine have added to the democratic media policy paradigm a question of national security. Now it is a challenge for the policy makers to unite polarised media fields and how to minimise the impact of Russian propaganda. On the EU level, one supportive measure could be a revision of the Audiovisual Media Service Directive.

Suggested Citation

  • Andres Jõesaar, 2015. "One Country, Two Polarised Audiences: Estonia and the Deficiency of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 45-51.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v3:y:2015:i:4:p:45-51
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v3i4.383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/383
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v3i4.383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v3:y:2015:i:4:p:45-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.