IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v12y2024a7443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovations in Journalism as Complex Interplay: Supportive and Obstructive Factors in International Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Meier

    (School of Journalism, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Germany)

  • Michael Graßl

    (School of Journalism, Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Germany)

  • Jose Alberto García-Avilés

    (Department of Social Sciences, Miguel Hernández University, Spain)

  • Dámaso Mondejar

    (Department of Social Sciences, Miguel Hernández University, Spain)

  • Andy Kaltenbrunner

    (Medienhaus Wien, Austria / Institute for Comparative Media and Communication Studies, Austrian Academy of Sciences and the University of Klagenfurt, Austria)

  • Renée Lugschitz

    (Medienhaus Wien, Austria / Institute for Comparative Media and Communication Studies, Austrian Academy of Sciences and the University of Klagenfurt, Austria)

  • Colin Porlezza

    (Institute of Media and Journalism, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland / Department of Journalism, City, University of London, UK)

  • Petra Mazzoni

    (Institute of Media and Journalism, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland)

  • Vinzenz Wyss

    (IAM Institute of Applied Media Studies, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland)

  • Mirco Saner

    (IAM Institute of Applied Media Studies, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland)

Abstract

Where does innovation in journalism come from, how is it implemented, and what factors drive or hinder its development? Scholars have explored these questions from different perspectives for over two decades. Our research holistically considers the broader factors that influence the development of journalistic innovation at the macro, meso, and micro levels, and whether it is internally or externally driven. In a three-year international research project, we have unpacked innovation with this multidimensional approach, looking at the most important innovations in journalism in Austria, Germany, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK. Our study focuses on the mutual interplay between journalists, media organizations, and society. We investigated 100 case studies with 137 guided interviews with senior managers or project leaders. The results show that the focus of supporting and obstructive factors is internal and on the meso level and that many parallels exist between media systems. Internal factors are the intrinsic motivation of individuals, which need the support of open-minded management, allowing a culture of experimentation without economic pressure and assembling interdisciplinary teams. Across countries and independent of the respective media system, three external key drivers of innovation in journalism can be identified: technology, societal change, and change in the digital media universe. The study confirms once again as if through a magnifying glass that journalism is primarily a public service, especially for those innovations that strengthen the role of journalism in a democratic society.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Meier & Michael Graßl & Jose Alberto García-Avilés & Dámaso Mondejar & Andy Kaltenbrunner & Renée Lugschitz & Colin Porlezza & Petra Mazzoni & Vinzenz Wyss & Mirco Saner, 2024. "Innovations in Journalism as Complex Interplay: Supportive and Obstructive Factors in International Comparison," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:7443
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.7443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7443
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.7443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank Harbers & Sandra Banjac & Scott A. Eldridge II, 2024. "Conceptualizing and Contextualizing Media Innovation and Change," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:7443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.