IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v12y2024a7399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizations as Innovations: Examining Changes in Journalism Through the Lens of Newly-Emerging Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Buschow

    (Faculty of Media, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany / Hamburg Media School, Germany)

  • Maike Suhr

    (Faculty of Media, Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Germany)

Abstract

This article argues that the growing variety of new journalistic organizations and their diversification beyond the traditional newsroom may offer a deeper and broader understanding of change and innovation within journalism. Newly emerging organizations play a multifaceted role in journalism: They are both drivers and results of change; they serve as indicators of the ways in which the structures of journalism and its production processes are evolving; they reveal industry trends early on and enable longitudinal research. Despite the emergence of non-traditional organizations in journalism, existing studies on these new entities remain fragmented and have yet to coalesce into a sustained research program. Against this background, this conceptual article aims to contribute to the ongoing theoretical progress in journalism studies in three ways. First, it identifies key factors of why organizational innovations happen. Second, it systemizes recent studies exemplifying the plurality of new organizations in journalism according to different levels from organization studies, including the field level, the level of organizational populations, and the level of the single organization. Finally, the article proposes a research agenda for establishing “organizations as innovations” as a novel conceptual lens for understanding change and innovation in journalism studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Buschow & Maike Suhr, 2024. "Organizations as Innovations: Examining Changes in Journalism Through the Lens of Newly-Emerging Organizations," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:7399
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.7399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7399
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.7399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott A. Eldridge II, 2019. "Where Do We Draw the Line? Interlopers, (Ant)agonists, and an Unbounded Journalistic Field," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 8-18.
    2. Christopher Buschow & Maike Suhr & Hauke Serger, 2022. "Media Work as Field Advancement: The Case of Science Media Center Germany," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 99-109.
    3. Patrick Ferrucci & Jacob L. Nelson, 2019. "The New Advertisers: How Foundation Funding Impacts Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 45-55.
    4. Christopher Buschow & Maike Suhr, 2022. "Change Management and New Organizational Forms of Content Creation," Springer Books, in: Matthias Karmasin & Sandra Diehl & Isabell Koinig (ed.), Media and Change Management, chapter 0, pages 381-397, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank Harbers & Sandra Banjac & Scott A. Eldridge II, 2024. "Conceptualizing and Contextualizing Media Innovation and Change," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valerie Belair-Gagnon & Avery E. Holton & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "Space for the Liminal," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7.
    2. Jessica Kunert, 2020. "Automation in Sports Reporting: Strategies of Data Providers, Software Providers, and Media Outlets," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 5-15.
    3. Salla-Maaria Laaksonen & Mikko Villi, 2022. "Editorial: New Forms of Media Work and Its Organizational and Institutional Conditions," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-4.
    4. Christopher Buschow & Maike Suhr & Hauke Serger, 2022. "Media Work as Field Advancement: The Case of Science Media Center Germany," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 99-109.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v12:y:2024:a:7399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.