IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i4p308-319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas B. Ksiazek

    (Department of Communication, Villanova University, USA)

  • Su Jung Kim

    (Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, USA)

  • Jacob L. Nelson

    (Department of Communication, University of Utah, USA)

  • Ahran Park

    (School of Media & Communication, Korea University, Republic of Korea)

  • Sushobhan Patankar

    (Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India)

  • Olivia Sabalaskey

    (Department of Communication, Villanova University, USA)

  • Harsh Taneja

    (Institute of Communications Research, University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign, USA)

Abstract

Trust in news is declining globally and has been for some time a phenomenon that has been amplified in the context of a global pandemic, the rise in anti-media populism, and social and political unrest. Overall, public trust in journalism remains low (44% globally), according to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 . Building on a growing body of research on predictors of (dis)trust among news audiences, this study examines survey data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021 to explore distrust profiles—comparative profiles of users based on their relative distrust in news in general, news they consume, and news accessed through digital intermediaries like social and search—across distinct news environments: India, South Korea, and the US. We conclude that, across all three countries, there are large segments who either trust everything or distrust everything, suggesting a trust polarization phenomenon. Moreover, the results identify segments of swing trusters, users who trust some news and distrust other types but do not indicate a blanket tendency to trust or distrust everything. Normative expectations about the institution of journalism (i.e., folk theories) seem to be the most powerful factors in explaining the relative likelihood of membership in all profiles, where expectations regarding impartiality, concern about fake news, and fair coverage were important indicators of (dis)trust, with varying degrees depending on the media, political, and technological contexts in which they are situated. These findings suggest that to regain trust, journalists should consider how they can change people’s folk theories when it comes to news by comprehensively taking into account the unique trajectory of a given country’s media system.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas B. Ksiazek & Su Jung Kim & Jacob L. Nelson & Ahran Park & Sushobhan Patankar & Olivia Sabalaskey & Harsh Taneja, 2023. "Distrust Profiles: Identifying the Factors That Shape Journalism’s Credibility Crisis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 308-319.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:4:p:308-319
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/7071
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:4:p:308-319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.