IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v11y2023i1p1-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age: Towards (More) Comparative Analyses in Hybrid Media Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Linards Udris

    (Research Center for the Public Sphere and Society (fög), University of Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Mark Eisenegger

    (Department of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Referendum campaigns, which happen in many countries on the national or sub-national level, are highly important and special periods of political communication. Unlike elections, however, referendum campaigns are understudied phenomena. This thematic issue addresses patterns of referendum campaigns, which increasingly take place in digital and hybrid media environments, where political actors conduct campaigns through various channels, news media react to and shape debates on social media, and citizens receive a large share of political information from traditional and digital media. In this editorial, we provide a short overview of how research on referendum campaigns has evolved and how it has started to shift its attention away from news coverage and toward the role of campaign actors and the citizens who use (or engage with) search engines and social media platforms. The articles in this thematic issue reflect this shift but also show that news media remain important actors in referendum campaigns. Finally, we outline further research steps, which should include even more holistic analyses of the hybridity of referendum campaigns and hopefully more comparisons across cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Linards Udris & Mark Eisenegger, 2023. "Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age: Towards (More) Comparative Analyses in Hybrid Media Systems," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:1:p:1-5
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v11i1.6703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6703
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v11i1.6703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sina Blassnig & Eliza Mitova & Nico Pfiffner & Michael V. Reiss, 2023. "Googling Referendum Campaigns: Analyzing Online Search Patterns Regarding Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 19-30.
    2. Marta Rychert & Chris Wilkins, 2023. "Referendum Campaigns in Hybrid Media Systems: Insights From the New Zealand Cannabis Legalisation Referendum," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 56-68.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linards Udris & Mark Eisenegger, 2023. "Referendum Campaigns in the Digital Age: Towards (More) Comparative Analyses in Hybrid Media Systems," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 1-5.
    2. Theresa Reidy & Jane Suiter, 2023. "Does Social Media Use Matter? A Case Study of the 2018 Irish Abortion Referendum," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 81-85.
    3. Theresa Reidy & Jane Suiter, 2023. "Does Social Media Use Matter? A Case Study of the 2018 Irish Abortion Referendum," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 81-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v11:y:2023:i:1:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.