IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i4p18-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Another Violent Protest? New Perspectives to Understand Protest Coverage

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Proust

    (Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, USA)

  • Magdalena Saldaña

    (School of Communications, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile / Center for the Study of Media, Public Opinion, and Politics in Chile, Chile / Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Chile)

Abstract

This study assesses the relationship between two well-established sets of frames to better understand the news coverage of massive political protests. By relying on Semetko and Valkenburg’s generic frames and McLeod and Hertog’s protest frames, this study aims to identify whether certain generic frames emphasized in news stories increase the tendency to delegitimize protest movements. To this end, we analyzed the news coverage of Chile’s Estallido Social, a series of massive political demonstrations that developed across the country from October to December 2019. Data for this study come from stories published by Radio Bío Bío, the most trusted news outlet in the country, according to Reuters Institute. By analyzing a sample of 417 stories, we found the coverage replicated patterns that usually delegitimize protest movements, as many of the stories focused on violent acts and depicted demonstrators as deviant from the status quo. We also found a direct relationship between generic frames and protest frames, in which the presence of the former determines that of the latter. Generic frames provide information about how the news media interpret and package the news, which in turn affects demonstration-related features that the news media pay attention to. As such, we argue that combining both generic and issue-specific frames is a helpful approach to understanding the complexities of protest news coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Proust & Magdalena Saldaña, 2022. "Another Violent Protest? New Perspectives to Understand Protest Coverage," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 18-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:18-29
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v10i4.5796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5796
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donoso, Sofia & Sehnbruch, Kirsten, 2020. "Social protests in Chile: inequalities and other inconvenient truths about Latin America's poster child," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103238, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentina Proust & Magdalena Saldaña, 2022. "Another Violent Protest? New Perspectives to Understand Protest Coverage," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 18-29.
    2. Irarrázaval, Andrés, 2020. "The fiscal origins of comparative inequality levels: an empirical and historical investigation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107491, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Irarrázaval, Andrés, 2020. "The fiscal origins of comparative inequality levels: an empirical and historical investigation," Economic History Working Papers 107491, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    4. Sasse, Lea, 2021. "Chile despertó - The reasons for the mass protests in Chile 2019/2020," IPE Working Papers 166/2021, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:18-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.