IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i3p89-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Cornelia Mothes

    (Department of Culture, Media, and Psychology, Macromedia University of Applied Sciences, Germany)

  • Jakob Ohme

    (Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

This thematic issue includes ten articles that address previous contradictions in research on two main trends in digital democracies: news avoidance and political polarization. Looking at these contradictions from different angles, all contributions suggest one aspect in particular that could be important for future research to investigate more specifically possible countermeasures to harmful trends: the individualized, self-reflective way in which media users nowadays engage with political content. The increasingly value-based individualization of media use may be a hopeful starting point for reversing harmful trends to some degree by addressing individual media users as a community with a common base of civic values, rather than addressing them in their limited social group identities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornelia Mothes & Jakob Ohme, 2022. "Enlightening Confusion: How Contradictory Findings Help Mitigate Problematic Trends in Digital Democracies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 89-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:89-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/6155
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin A. Lyons, 2022. "Insidiously Trivial: Meme Format Reduces Perceived Influence and Intent to Debate Partisan Claims," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 196-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:89-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.