IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v10y2022i3p39-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

United in Grief? Emotional Communities Around the Far-Right Terrorist Attack in Hanau

Author

Listed:
  • Débora Medeiros

    (Collaborative Research Center Affective Societies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

  • Ana Makhashvili

    (Collaborative Research Center Affective Societies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Drawing on theories of affect, emotion, and new institutionalism, we analyze discourse around the right-wing terrorist attack in Hanau, Germany, to identify the different ways in which emotions and affect circulate on legacy media and Twitter and how they help establish varying emotional communities. Building upon an understanding of journalism as an affective institution, our article takes a close look at how journalism attempts to assert its role in public spheres not only by circulating information but also by providing emotional interpretations of events. Journalism’s emotional interpretations, however, do not remain unchallenged. With the emergence of the hybrid media system, users engage in various forms of interaction on social media platforms, forming “affective publics” by connecting through their affective reactions to current issues and events. In these interactions, distinct emotional communities may emerge, built around performative, political emotions. Our data comprises various news shows aired on the German public service broadcaster ARD as well as a dataset of tweets about #Hanau that were collected in the immediate aftermath of the attack. The results of our mixed-methods analysis reveal that different performances of grief played a central role both on TV news and on social media. On TV, grief was nationally connotated and aimed at uniting Germany’s population. On social media, it fueled anti-racist activism, as seen on the hashtag #SayTheirNames, honoring the victims of the attack.

Suggested Citation

  • Débora Medeiros & Ana Makhashvili, 2022. "United in Grief? Emotional Communities Around the Far-Right Terrorist Attack in Hanau," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 39-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:39-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/5438
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margreth Lünenborg & Tanja Maier, 2018. "The Turn to Affect and Emotion in Media Studies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-4.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Precious N. Chatterje-Doody & Rhys Crilley, 2019. "Making Sense of Emotions and Affective Investments in War: RT and the Syrian Conflict on YouTube," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 167-178.
    2. Monika Taddicken & Laura Wolff, 2020. "‘Fake News’ in Science Communication: Emotions and Strategies of Coping with Dissonance Online," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 206-217.
    3. Shari Adlung & Margreth Lünenborg & Christoph Raetzsch, 2021. "Pitching Gender in a Racist Tune: The Affective Publics of the #120decibel Campaign," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 16-26.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:39-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.